LogoLogo
CtrlK
SNOMED International WebsiteSNOMED Forums
Cancer Synoptic Reporting Implementation Guide
  • SNOMED CT Document Library
  • Practical Guides
  • Specifications
  • Implementation Guides
  • User Guides
  • SNOMED CT Implementation Guide for Cancer Synoptic Reporting
  • Executive Summary
  • Introduction
  • Use Cases
    • General Use Cases
    • Clinical Application Examples
    • Clinical Scenarios
  • SNOMED CT Content
    • Scope of Cancer Synoptic Reporting
    • Observable Entity/Observation Pairs versus Clinical Findings
    • Observable Entity Defining Attributes Employed in this Project
  • Information Models and Terminology Binding
    • General Cancer Report Structure
    • Cancer Synoptic Reporting Protocol Sample Forms
    • SNOMED CT Bindings
      • Terminology Binding Principles
      • Terminology Binding Examples
      • Conditional Logic and Nested Observable Concept Binding
  • Technical Application
    • Implementation Approaches
    • Standardized Model Representation using FHIR
      • FHIR Resources
      • FHIR Questionnaires
      • Examples
      • Usage Considerations for FHIR Questionnaires
  • Appendices
    • How to Learn More ?
  • Previous Versions
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Export as PDF

Technical Application

In this chapter, the considerations related to the technical application of cancer synoptic reporting forms with SNOMED CT are presented. It explores the emerging use of FHIR for standardized model representation, comparing creating new FHIR resources to using FHIR Questionnaires. Benefits and limitations of each approach are outlined, with a focus on the practicality and advantages of FHIR Questionnaires in most scenarios.

PreviousConditional Logic and Nested Observable Concept BindingNextImplementation Approaches

Last updated 14 days ago

Copyright © 2025 SNOMED International