For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Maturity Levels

Overview

The Implementation Maturity Framework (IMF) provides a consistent yet flexible model for assessing how SNOMED CT is adopted and used across the healthcare ecosystem.

The general maturity levels provide a shared foundation for assessing SNOMED CT implementation and ensure consistency across the ecosystem. However, their application varies by stakeholder, reflecting different roles, responsibilities, and objectives.

  • Members (National Release Centers) apply the maturity levels at a national or regional level, focusing on governance frameworks, policy alignment, infrastructure, and the breadth of adoption across affiliates and healthcare systems.

  • User Organizations apply the maturity levels to clinical and operational implementation, including how SNOMED CT is embedded within systems, integrated into workflows, and used to support care delivery, reporting, and decision-making.

  • Vendors / Software Providers apply the maturity levels to the capabilities of their products or platforms, such as terminology integration, usability, interoperability, and support for analytics and decision support.

While each stakeholder group uses tailored criteria and assessment questions, they remain aligned to the same overarching maturity scale. This ensures:

  • A common language for benchmarking and comparison

  • Alignment across the ecosystem

  • Support for coordinated progress toward higher maturity

Maturity Level Descriptions

These levels provide a common foundation for assessing SNOMED CT implementation maturity, regardless of stakeholder type. Each level represents a progression in capability, structure, and value realization.


Level 0 – None

  • No awareness or use of SNOMED CT

  • No governance, strategy, or supporting infrastructure

  • Clinical or operational data captured using free text or local codes only

  • No capability for interoperability or standardized data exchange


Level 1 – Basic

  • Limited awareness or early understanding of SNOMED CT

  • Minimal or experimental use in isolated areas

  • No formal governance, strategy, or implementation roadmap

  • Use is inconsistent and not embedded in workflows


Level 2 – Emerging

  • Initial strategy and planning activities underway

  • Pilot projects or early implementations in selected areas

  • Early governance structures and roles being defined

  • Growing stakeholder awareness and engagement


Level 3 – Advanced

  • Broader implementation across systems, departments, or affiliates

  • SNOMED CT integrated into key workflows and operational processes

  • Established governance, policies, and maintenance practices

  • Training and support mechanisms in place

  • Data increasingly used for reporting and operational insights


Level 4 – Integrated

  • Widespread, consistent adoption across the organization or ecosystem

  • Interoperability enabled through alignment with standards (e.g., HL7, FHIR)

  • Strong governance with monitoring, quality assurance, and performance tracking

  • SNOMED CT data actively used for analytics and decision support

  • Measurable improvements in data quality and outcomes


Level 5 – Optimizing

  • Fully embedded and sustained use across all systems and workflows

  • Advanced analytics, real-time decision support, and AI-driven capabilities

  • Continuous improvement embedded in governance and operations

  • High-quality, interoperable data supporting research, policy, and innovation

  • Leadership in terminology management and best practices

SNOMED CT Implementation Maturity Matrix

This matrix below provides a side-by-side view of SNOMED CT implementation maturity across Members, User Organizations, and Vendors, using a common set of levels from None to Optimizing. It highlights how each stakeholder progresses along the same maturity scale while focusing on different responsibilities - national adoption, clinical use, and product capability.

The matrix supports comparison, alignment, and a shared understanding of how coordinated advancement across stakeholders enables effective, interoperable, and data-driven healthcare systems.

Level
Members
User Organizations
Vendors

Level 0 – None

No national activity, no governance, no awareness

No use of SNOMED CT, reliance on free text/local codes

No SNOMED CT support, no terminology integration

Level 1 – Basic

Awareness exists, informal discussions, no national program

Limited use in isolated areas, minimal workflow integration

Basic functionality in limited modules, inconsistent implementation

Level 2 – Emerging

Strategy forming, pilots underway, early governance

Use in selected departments, early workflow integration, basic training

Implemented in some modules, basic search/tools, early interoperability

Level 3 – Advanced

Expanding adoption, governance established, monitoring introduced

Regular use in key workflows, structured governance and training

Integrated across core features, improved usability, standards-based interoperability

Level 4 – Integrated

Widespread national adoption, strong governance, aligned with national strategy

Enterprise-wide implementation, interoperability, analytics and decision support

Broad implementation, advanced usability (e.g., NLP), integrated analytics and CDS

Level 5 – Optimizing

Fully optimized national ecosystem, advanced secondary use, global leadership

Fully embedded, AI-driven insights, continuous improvement

Intelligent platform, AI-driven features, real-time interoperability, continuous innovation


Provide Feedback

Last updated