All pages
Powered by GitBook
1 of 1

Loading...

Example: User Organization

Scenario

A regional hospital that:

  • Uses SNOMED CT in several key departments (e.g., emergency, inpatient)

  • Has invested in clinician training and support

  • Has inconsistent workflow integration across systems

  • Has limited interoperability with external partners

  • Uses SNOMED CT minimally for analytics and decision support

This reflects a typical provider organization, where adoption is driven by local clinical needs rather than enterprise-wide strategy.


Question
Selected Option
Score

KPA Score = (25 + 25) Γ· 2 = 25


Question
Selected Option
Score

KPA Score = 25


Question
Selected Option
Score

KPA Score = 50


Question
Selected Option
Score

KPA Score = 25


Question
Selected Option
Score

KPA Score = 25


Area
Score
Level

Domain Score = (25 + 25 + 50 + 25 + 25) Γ· 5 = 30

β†’ Level 1 – Basic (upper range)


  • Emerging training programs and internal expertise

  • Early clinical adoption in selected departments

  • Growing awareness of SNOMED CT benefits

  • Limited and inconsistent adoption across the organization

  • Lack of formal governance and strategy

  • Weak interoperability and standards alignment

  • Minimal use of SNOMED CT for analytics or decision support


To progress to Level 2–3, the organization should:

  • Define roles and responsibilities

  • Develop an implementation roadmap

  • Align with organizational strategy

  • Roll out SNOMED CT across more departments

  • Standardize usage across systems

  • Embed SNOMED CT in clinical documentation and processes

  • Reduce reliance on free text

  • Align with standards (e.g., FHIR)

  • Improve data exchange with partners

  • Use SNOMED CT for reporting and quality improvement

  • Introduce basic dashboards and insights


Clinical Areas

Partial – uneven coverage

25

Clinical Workflows

Developing – partial workflow integration

Governance Structure

Basic governance

25

Strategic Alignment

Informal discussions

Training Programs

Structured programs

50

User Support

Identified champions

Data Exchange

Limited interoperability

25

Standards Alignment

Incomplete mappings

Analytics Tools

Basic analytics

25

Decision Support

Limited tools

Scope of Implementation

25

Level 1–2

Governance & Strategy

25

Step 1: Score Key Questions

KPA: Scope of SNOMED CT Implementation

KPA: Governance and Strategy

KPA: User Proficiency and Training

KPA: Interoperability

KPA: Analytics and Decision Support

Step 2: Overall Maturity Level

Interpretation

Strengths

Weaknesses

Priority Actions

1. Establish Governance

2. Expand Adoption

3. Improve Workflow Integration

4. Strengthen Interoperability

5. Build Analytics Capability

Provide Feedback

25

25

50

25

25

Level 1

Training & Support

50

Level 2

Interoperability

25

Level 1

Analytics & CDS

25

Level 1

Overall

30

Level 1 – Basic