A regional hospital that:
Uses SNOMED CT in several key departments (e.g., emergency, inpatient)
Has invested in clinician training and support
Has inconsistent workflow integration across systems
Has limited interoperability with external partners
Uses SNOMED CT minimally for analytics and decision support
This reflects a typical provider organization, where adoption is driven by local clinical needs rather than enterprise-wide strategy.
KPA Score = (25 + 25) Γ· 2 = 25
KPA Score = 25
KPA Score = 50
KPA Score = 25
KPA Score = 25
Domain Score = (25 + 25 + 50 + 25 + 25) Γ· 5 = 30
β Level 1 β Basic (upper range)
Emerging training programs and internal expertise
Early clinical adoption in selected departments
Growing awareness of SNOMED CT benefits
Limited and inconsistent adoption across the organization
Lack of formal governance and strategy
Weak interoperability and standards alignment
Minimal use of SNOMED CT for analytics or decision support
To progress to Level 2β3, the organization should:
Define roles and responsibilities
Develop an implementation roadmap
Align with organizational strategy
Roll out SNOMED CT across more departments
Standardize usage across systems
Embed SNOMED CT in clinical documentation and processes
Reduce reliance on free text
Align with standards (e.g., FHIR)
Improve data exchange with partners
Use SNOMED CT for reporting and quality improvement
Introduce basic dashboards and insights
Clinical Areas
Partial β uneven coverage
25
Clinical Workflows
Developing β partial workflow integration
Governance Structure
Basic governance
25
Strategic Alignment
Informal discussions
Training Programs
Structured programs
50
User Support
Identified champions
Data Exchange
Limited interoperability
25
Standards Alignment
Incomplete mappings
Analytics Tools
Basic analytics
25
Decision Support
Limited tools
Scope of Implementation
25
Level 1β2
Governance & Strategy
25
25
25
50
25
25
Level 1
Training & Support
50
Level 2
Interoperability
25
Level 1
Analytics & CDS
25
Level 1
Overall
30
Level 1 β Basic