All pages
Powered by GitBook
1 of 45

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Acquired abnormality of congenital anomaly

For those concepts that describe a congenital anomaly that has been repaired and subsequently acquired an abnormality, follow the naming convention of |Acquired abnormality of X following repair of congenital X (disorder)|.

  • For example,

    • 871598001 |Acquired abnormality of common arterial trunk following repair of truncus arteriosus (disorder)|

Provide Feedback

Lateralized Disorder Naming Conventions

For more information

See also Anatomical Structure Naming Conventions section and Laterality section

Right, left disorder concepts

When creating a lateralized disorder concept, two concepts should be created:

  1. concept for the left side

  2. concept for the right side

Descriptions

  • FSN: <morphologic abnormality> of <right/left> <body structure> (disorder)

  • PT: Right/left

    • For example, 1089071000119109 |Inflammation of left mastoid (disorder)|

      • FSN: Inflammation of left mastoid (disorder)

      • PT: Left mastoiditis

When creating a lateralized disorder concept, if a non-lateralized parent does not exist, then it should be created as well. In other words, do not just create the right and left versions, but also create a concept to represent the laterality-agnostic parent.

  • For example,

    • When creating Inflammation of left mastoid and Inflammation of right mastoid, also ensure a concept for Inflammation of mastoid exists.

Where the disorder is left/right of a specific anatomical site, and the preferred term naming pattern of Right/left causes a combination that does not sound like natural flowing English, the guidance above can be circumvented. See the section and Laterality section .

  • For example,

    • Left interphalangeal thumb joint open traumatic dislocation should follow naming guidance of Open traumatic dislocation of interphalangeal joint of left thumb.

    • Left abscess of foot is an incorrect term; instead, this should read Abscess of left foot.

Where the bilateral disorder description causes a combination that does not sound like natural flowing English, the guidance below can be circumvented.

  • FSN: of bilateral (disorder)

  • PT: Bilateral

  • SYN: of bilateral

  • SYN: of both

  • FSN: of bilateral (disorder)

  • PT: of bilateral

  • SYN: of both

Note the PT of Bilateral is not required. Bilateral is to describe the body site, not the morphologic abnormality.

  • For example, 15725081000119100 | Effusion of joint of bilateral feet (disorder) |

    • FSN: Effusion of joint of bilateral feet (disorder)

    • PT: Effusion of joint of bilateral feet

    • SYN: Effusion of joint of both feet

Also note that joint is singular. This is to denote that the joint may be singular on each side of the body; the plurality of feet will represent the laterality. Using joints as plural may incorrectly reflect that there are multiple joints affected in both feet.

Bilateral disorders should be modeled using two relationship groups, one for each lateralized body structure.

For example, 1084011000119100 |Inflammation of bilateral mastoids (disorder)|

  • FSN: Inflammation of bilateral mastoids (disorder)

  • PT: Bilateral mastoiditis

  • SYN: Inflammation of bilateral mastoids

  • SYN: Inflammation of both mastoids

Unilateral

With the addition of lateralized content in the International Release, the need for unspecified unilateral concepts is removed, as well as potentially dangerous, if used directly in a patient record. Unilateral concepts are not accepted.

Bilateral disorder concepts

When the body structure and the morphologic abnormality are combined into one word, the following naming pattern applies:

When the body structure and morphologic abnormality are separate, the following naming pattern applies:

Do not use both to describe disorders of the eyelids unless the concept means both upper eyelids or both lower eyelids; only then can that synonym be included for bilateral eyelid disorder concepts.

Modeling of bilateral disorders

Structure, Structure of

Lateralized disorder concepts should not include the words structure or structure of.

  • For example,

    • With use of 266005 |Structure of lower lobe of right lung (body structure)|:

      • a disorder concept is termed |Malignant neoplasm of lower lobe of right lung (disorder)|

      • a procedure is termed |Lobectomy of lower lobe of right lung (procedure)|

Naming Convention for Digits of Hand and Foot
Laterality
Provide Feedback
Naming Convention for Digits of Hand and Foot
Laterality
Stated view of Inflammation of left mastoid (disorder)
Stated view of Inflammation of bilateral mastoids (disorder) with a role group for each side

Arrhythmia

Cardiologists noted confusion in the placement of Conduction disorder of the heart (disorder) as a broad grouping that subsumed arrhythmias and heart blocks. In common usage arrhythmia refers to a broad set of conditions that include conduction disorders, under which are heart blocks. The concept Cardiac arrhythmia (disorder) is a parent of Conduction disorder of the heart (disorder), and the active referent of the inactive concepts named dysrhythmia or arrhythmia.

For example,

  • Arrhythmias, like 72654001 |Supraventricular arrhythmia (disorder)|, are under 698247007 |Cardiac arrhythmia (disorder)|

Conduction disorders include heart block, AV block, bundle branch block, conduction delay, and conduction defect, like 418341009 | Atrioventricular conduction disorder (disorder) |. Other arrhythmias were moved from under 44808001 |Conduction disorder of the heart (disorder)| and placed under 698247007 |Cardiac arrhythmia (disorder)|.

Provide Feedback

Genetic, developmental, congenital, and physical origin

The following figure shows the structure of genetic, developmental, and congenital categories, along with non-genetic, non-developmental, and postnatal categories. A dimension, called extrinsic physical force , is included to distinguish deformations from malformations. The sections of the diagram represent categories formed from the combination of the dimensions, each which represents the answer to one of the following questions:

  • Is it genetic or not?

  • Is it developmental or not?

  • Is it present at birth or not?

  • Is it due to an extrinsic physical force or not?

Explanation of Figure

The sections with diagonal hashed lines represent combination categories that do not occur.

  • For example, there are no genetic disorders that are due to an extrinsic physical force. Likewise, there are no congenital disorders that are considered non-developmental.

The sections with blue crossing lines represent congenital malformations; they may be either genetic or non-genetic.

  • For example, congenital infectious malformations

The red circle represents congenital genetic malformations.

The blue sections represent acquired , i.e. disorders that are non-genetic and not present at birth.

  • For example, Vitamin D deficiency (rickets) in children is a non-genetic, non-congenital, developmental malformation.

The white sections represent genetic congenital or genetic postnatal disorders.

  • For example, Huntington's disease is a genetic disease that is neither congenital nor developmental. The gene defect is present at birth, but the disease does not manifest until adulthood.

Arrows leading from the sections point to examples of disorders for the category.

Developmental is a useful label for disorders that affect developing structures or functions that may occur pre- or postnatally. They may be present at birth or develop later.

The term familial may also be ambiguous when used for broad categories. It may mean that the disorder is found in higher proportions in the immediate or extended family compared to other groups. Or, it may mean there is a possibility of a disease being inherited. It may be used; however, it may require clarification of meaning from the requestor. It should not be used as a synonym for genetic.

It may be a challenge to classify a condition as a 32895009 |Hereditary disease (disorder)|. H ereditary requires case-by-case definition; it cannot be applied to broad categories. Nevertheless, the names by which many diseases are known include the term, and it is permitted, as long as it does not introduce ambiguity.

Co-occuring Genomic Disorders

Germline chromosomal abnormality co-occurring and causing disorder: 41040004 | Complete trisomy 21 syndrome (disorder)|

If the phenotype is always caused by a specific genotype, there is no need to include the cause in the FSN or clarify with a Due to relationship.

Germline nucleotide sequence variant co-occurring and causing disorder: 190905008 | Cystic fibrosis (disorder)|

Modeling for germline mutations causing conditions, such as cystic fibrosis, should have mutations, Occurrence = congenital, and Due to (attribute) the mutation finding.

For example,

  • Cystic fibrosis due to G542X mutation

Somatic NSV (NCBI structural variant) co-occurring and poly-etiologic : BRAF V600E positive melanoma

Somatic mutations leading to cancer, such as malignant melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation , should have dual supertypes , including the malignant disorder and the somatic mutation, and Due to (attribute) with the associated somatic mutation finding.

For example,

  • Melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation

Representing two associated findings in a single concept may be convenient for recording; however, the representation of the two notions should be recorded separately.

For example,

  • Breast cancer occurring with positive estrogen-receptor assay should be recorded in the information model as two separate concepts

Somatic IHC (immunohistochemical) finding co-occurring but not etiologic: Estrogen-receptor status in breast cancer

The term phrase, "co-occurrent and due to" is no longer to be used in the fully specified name. There are existing concepts that use the co-occurrent and due to pattern, but these will be re-termed. Genetic mutations that cause a disorder are by definition co-occurrent, so there is no need to represent this in the FSN, but they should be modeled as co-occurring, i.e. supertypes for both conditions should be present.

Provide Feedback

Developmental

Familial

Hereditary

Provide Feedback
The relationships of genetic, congenital, developmental, and acquired disorders

Clinical Finding and Disorder Naming Conventions

FSN

A Clinical finding/Disorder concept's fully specified name (FSN) must be specific, though the preferred term (PT) can be a more clinician-friendly, word-order variant.

FSN Pattern

The FSN must conform to a specific pattern of "Disease of x" where a specific body structure is involved. For the preferred term, end users can choose the desired description that conforms to common clinical usage.

For example,

  • FSN: Disease of kidney (disorder)

  • PT: Can be either 'Kidney disease' or 'Renal disease'

Use of -opathy

The use of -opathy is to be used in the preferred term, because the FSN is to be specific and explicit, and there are often various interpretations of -opathy. A term containing the suffix -opathy can only be used in the FSN if a definition is applied via the DEF description.

For example,

  • FSN: Disorder of macula of retina (disorder)

  • PT: Can be either 'Disorder of macula of retina' or 'Maculopathy'

The morphologic abnormality is named before naming the anatomical site.

For example,

  • In 399525009 | Inflammation of ampulla of Vater (disorder)|, Inflammation is the morphologic abnormality and Ampulla of Vater is the finding site.

Descriptions for Clinical findings and Disorders should follow the naming guidelines for Body structures if they are to be used within the Clinical finding/disorder concept.

Concepts describing limbs are abundant, and the use of limb in the FSN and the synonyms of upper/lower extremity, arm/leg should be followed.

  • For example,

    • 249945007 |Monoparesis of lower limb (disorder)|

Because the finding site is 61685007 |Lower limb structure (body structure)|, which follows the anatomical guidelines, the disorder concept reflects lower limb in the FSN, while using synonyms of Monoparesis of leg and Monoparesis of lower extremity.

The term cerebral is used in clinical language to mean both cerebrum , and more broadly, brain.

  • If the condition is limited to the cerebrum, the FSN, PT, and finding site will reflect the cerebrum. A synonym will remain with the term cerebral.

  • If the condition refers more broadly to the brain, the FSN, PT, and finding site will reflect the brain – unless the proper name of the condition uses the term cerebral , as in Cerebral palsy. A synonym will remain with the term cerebral if it is commonly used to refer to the condition.

The word disorder should be singular, so Disorder of nose , not Disorders of nose.

  • When the concept is a general grouping of disorders of a body system, body site, or other broad category, the word disorder is preferred over the word disease for the FSN, e.g. Disorder of reproductive system , not Disease of reproductive system. This does not apply at the leaf level.

  • For example,

    • 417683006 | Sickle cell-hemoglobin C disease without crisis (disorder)|

For naming conventions concerning surgical complications, sequelae, and late effects; see this section at .

The vast majority of existing X without Y concepts originated from ICD-9 with the specific meaning of "X disorder without mention of Y disorder". As the phraseology indicates a lack of data about disorder Y as opposed to a specific exclusion, this type of concept has not been included in ICD-10, nor proposed for ICD-11, except in the case of "Traumatic brain injury without open intracranial wound".

Addition of new X without Y concepts may only be made under the following conditions:

  • The request for new content must be accompanied by a rationale as to the difference between "X disorder without Y disorder" and "X disorder"

  • Approval of addition by the Chief Terminologist

For the most part, existing X without Y concepts will be inactivated as AMBIGUOUS with a historical MAY BE relationship to "X disorder". Exceptions to inactivation will be made on a case-by-case basis.

SNOMED international is no longer accepting new requests for concepts of the type – Requires [procedure/drug] (finding). These are administrative statuses rather than clinical findings, and this status should be represented outside of the terminology in the information model. The only exceptions relate to legacy content, and requests for subtypes of 723620004 |Requires vaccination (finding)| will continue to be accepted.

If the 363698007 | Finding site (attribute)| value of a concept is a body structure with "region" in its FSN, then the description of the finding site within the clinical finding concept's FSN should also include "region".

  • For example,

    274205003 | Burn of eye region (disorder)| has a finding site of 371398005 | Eye region structure (body structure)|.

    • FSN: Burn of eye region (disorder)

    • PT: Burn of eye region

Previously, allergies caused by multiple substances were modeled by multiple causative agents suggesting that the allergy is caused by all those substances. However, when multiple substances are noted in the FSN, the intended clinical meaning is that a patient might be affected by one or more of these substances (or products containing them). To convey this meaning, these types of concepts should be modeled GCIs to represent the disjunctive meaning. e.g. 870731003 |Allergy to carbidopa and/or levodopa (finding)|

Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) dispositions are the propensity to develop adverse allergic or nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) disorders. A description for any concept that names a substance or an organism should be consistent with the corresponding hierarchy description rules.

  • FSN: Allergy to X (finding)

  • PT: Allergy to X

For example,

  • FSN: Allergy to abacavir (finding)

  • PT: Allergy to abacavir

  • FSN: Allergy to Artemisia vulgaris pollen (finding)

  • PT: Allergy to mugwort pollen

FSN: Allergy to X and Y (finding)

PT: Allergy to X and Y

  • X and Y in alphabetical order for concepts representing multiple substances

These disorders represent manifestations of pathologic processes that may result in abnormal structures (e.g., allergic rhinitis).

Disorder
Patterns and examples

These disorders represent pathological processes that are defined as adverse reactions and allergic conditions with a pathological process of allergic or nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) process.

Reaction
Patterns and examples

Contact hypersensitivity represents a response elicited by contact of the skin or mucous membranes with a substance. The response may be immune mediated (allergic) or nonimmune (irritant) using the pathological process contact hypersensitivity process (qualifier value).

  • For example,

    • Contact dermatitis (disorder)

    • Irritant contact dermatitis (disorder)

An intolerance is the propensity to develop an adverse reaction to a substance. The nature of the adverse reaction can represent a variety of pathological processes but specifically excludes hypersensitivity (allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reactions.

Due to the difficulty in precisely defining an intolerance pathological process, it is problematic to apply the model for hypersensitivity dispositions to defining intolerance to substance. For this reason, as well as the difficulty in associating a material agent with a disposition, substances are related to the intolerance disposition with the associated with attribute.

Intolerance
Patterns and examples

Identification of findings of inadequate or excessive intake of nutrients inconsistent with nutrient requirements and established reference standards includes nutrients with a variety of forms where applicable.

For example,

870465001 | Excessive intake of vitamin A and vitamin A derivative (finding)|

FSN: Excessive intake of vitamin A and vitamin A derivative (finding)

PT: Excessive intake of vitamin A and vitamin A derivative

FSN

Patterns:

  • FSN: Allergic disease X (disorder)

  • FSN: Allergic disease X (caused by Y) (disorder)

For example,

  • Allergic rhinitis (disorder)

  • Allergic conjunctivitis (disorder)

  • Allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen (disorder)

  • Allergic rhinitis caused by house dust mite (disorder)

PT

Patterns:

  • Allergic disease X

  • Allergic disease X (caused by Y)

For example,

  • Allergic rhinitis

  • Allergic conjunctivitis

  • Allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen

  • Allergic rhinitis caused by house dust mite

FSN

Patterns:

  • Allergic reaction (caused by X) (disorder)

  • Anaphylactic reaction (caused by X) (disorder)

  • Anaphylactoid reaction (caused by X) (disorder)

For example,

  • Allergic reaction caused by dye (disorder)

  • Allergic reaction caused by pollen (disorder)

PT

Patterns:

  • Allergic reaction caused by X

For example,

  • Allergic reaction caused by dye

  • Allergic reaction caused by pollen

FSN

Pattern:

  • Intolerance to X (finding)

Example,

  • Intolerance to milk (finding)

PT

Pattern:

  • Intolerance to X

Example,

  • Intolerance to milk

Order of site and morphology

Exceptions

While the general naming convention for findings and disorders is < Morphology> of , there are some exceptions:

  • Disorders with a well recognized name that represents the morphology; e.g. pneumonia is the well established clinical name for inflammation and infection of the lung

  • Disorders where the meaning is not equivalent to < morphology> of site convention; e.g. inflammatory bowel disease has a more specific meaning than inflammation of bowel

  • Disorders which are not described by an anatomical site; e.g. metabolic disease, hereditary disease, bacterial disease

  • Completed or in review -

  • Proposed for future review -

Descriptions that include body structures

The term Disorder

Exceptions

Plurals may be used:

  • As synonyms for grouper concepts, e.g. disorders or diseases

  • In bilateral concepts, e.g. Disorder of bilateral eyes, Disorder of both eyes (see also Lateralized Disorder Naming Conventions)

Disorder X without Disorder Y

Requires [procedure/drug] (finding)

Region

Allergy to substances, multiple substances

Information

The modeling approach for multiple-ingredient concepts is a temporary solution. It incorrectly asserts an allergy/adverse reaction to each, rather than to one, agent. The use of concepts from the Pharmaceutical/biologic product hierarchy is being considered as a final solution, but further work is required to determine if this would be a viable solution.

Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) dispositions

Drug allergies

Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) concepts include drug allergies.

Pattern - Allergy to single substance:

Pattern - Allergy to multiple substances:

Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) disorders

Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reactions

Contact hypersensitivity

Intolerance to substances

Inadequate and excessive intake of energy and nutrients

Complication and Sequela Modeling
Provide Feedback
Stated view of |Burn of eye region (disorder)|

Neoplasm

The word tumor has two primary meanings: a mass, regardless of whether it is neoplastic or not; or a neoplastic mass. The term neoplasm is preferred since it is less ambiguous than tumor. The word tumor is acceptable as a synonym but not as a preferred term.

For example,

  • 92385005 |Benign neoplasm of small intestine (disorder)|

Previously in SNOMED CT, the hierarchy of 372087000 |Primary malignant neoplasm (disorder)| was defined by using an Associated morphology (attribute) relationship to <<86049000 |Malignant neoplasm, primary (morphologic abnormality)|. 86049000 |Malignant neoplasm, primary (morphologic abnormality)| and 367651003 |Malignant neoplasm of primary, secondary, or uncertain origin (morphologic abnormality)| have been inactivated in the November 2022 release and replaced with 1240414004 |Malignant neoplasm (morphologic abnormality)|.

Primary malignant neoplasm disorders are now defined with a role group combining:

Pre-coordination Naming Patterns Project
Unreviewed Patterns by Hierarchy

finding site

  • associated morphology

  • pathological process with a target value of 1234914003 |Malignant proliferation of primary neoplasm (qualifier value)|

  • For example,

    Figure: Stated view of 93825008 |Primary malignant neoplasm of heart (disorder)|

    Figure. Inferred view of 93825008 |Primary malignant neoplasm of heart (disorder)

    Precoordination of the metastatic malignant neoplasm with both the primary and metastatic sites is not allowed. Having both metastatic malignant neoplasm from x body structure to y body structure in a single concept results in a combinatorial explosion of all possible malignant neoplastic morphological cell types, with all possible body sites of the primary malignancy, and with all possible sites of the metastases. Users are instead directed to record two separate concepts.

    SNOMED CT joins ICD-O, ICD-10, and ICD-11 where metastatic malignant neoplasm of site x is uniformly interpreted to mean metastasis has occurred to site x. To make this explicit in SNOMED CT, the following terming has been adopted:

    FSN: Metastatic malignant neoplasm to x body structure (disorder) PT: Metastatic malignant neoplasm to x body structure SYN: Secondary malignant neoplasm of x body structure SYN: Metastatic malignant neoplasm of x body structure

    For example,

    FSN: Metastatic malignant neoplasm to foot (disorder) PT: Metastatic malignant neoplasm to foot SYN: Secondary malignant neoplasm of foot SYN: Metastatic malignant neoplasm of foot.

    Metastatic disorders are defined by a role group containing the finding site and specific metastatic morphologic abnormality.

    For example,

    Figure: Stated view of 105041000119109 |Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to lung (disorder)|

    Figure: Inferred view of 105041000119109 |Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to lung (disorder)|

    Disorder concepts defined with 1240414004 |Malignant neoplasm (morphologic abnormality)| may have cancer added as an acceptable synonym. The term cancer should not be used in the FSN or preferred term. Neither should it be used in descriptions for concepts that are more specific subtypes of the top level malignant neoplasm grouper (i.e., where the morphology is a specialized cell type).

    The term cancer may also be used in the 'metastatic cancer to x body structure ' synonym description where the morphological type of metastatic neoplasm is unknown, i.e., it is defined with 14799000 |Neoplasm, metastatic (morphologic abnormality)|.

    When modeling neoplasia, distinguish structure from process. Do not use neoplasia in the FSN to identify the structure (even though it implies it). Use 126537000 |Neoplasm of bone (disorder)|, not neoplasia of bone.

    Neoplastic disease refers to the process of neoplasia , leading to the formation of a neoplasm.

    A neoplasm is defined as a growth of tissue no longer under normal control. A hamartoma is defined as a benign, self-limiting growth of disorganized mature cells normally found in the region, representing faulty development. SNOMED CT has disorder (and morphologic abnormality) concepts and subtypes representing neoplasia, hamartomas, and tumors.

    The SNOMED CT concept 399981008 |Neoplasm and/or hamartoma (disorder)| has six subtypes:

    • angiomatosis

    • hamartoma

    • hemangioma

    • lymphangioma

    • melanocytic nevus

    • neoplastic disease

    The SNOMED CT concept 400177003 |Neoplasm and/or hamartoma (morphologic abnormality)| also has six subtypes:

    • angiomatosis

    • blood vessel tumor

    • hamartoma

    • lymphatic vessel tumor

    • melanocytic nevus

    • neoplasm

    The word nevus has many different meanings. The differences are generally based on answers to the following questions:

    • Is it necessarily on the skin? Or can it be located in mucosal sites or other sites?

    • Is it necessarily visible? Or can it be in internal locations such as gastric mucosa, etc?

    • Is it necessarily present at birth? Or can it occur later in life?

    • Is it necessarily dark and made of melanocytes? Or can it be non-pigmented, or made of other types of cells?

    • Is it necessarily made of tissue that is normally present at the site? Or can it be ectopic?

    • Does it exclude benign neoplasms?

    Some common meanings of nevus based on some combinations of answers to the questions are as follows:

    • A birthmark, that is, any visible spot on the skin or oral mucosa present since birth, regardless of tissue of origin, excluding benign neoplasms.

    • Any benign cluster of melanocytes, regardless of location, and regardless of pigmentation, whether present since birth or appearing later.

    • Any cutaneous hamartoma. This excludes non-cutaneous sites, and excludes neoplasms and ectopic tissue, such as choristomas.

    As a result of this wide variation in meaning, any SNOMED CT FSN containing the word nevus may be ambiguous. For example, the term vascular nevus may mean:

    • Congenital blood vessel tumor in the skin

    • Congenital blood vessel hamartoma or neoplasm that is visible somewhere (not only the skin, but also the mucosa, whether visible externally or not)

    • Congenital blood or lymphatic vessel tumor in the skin

    • Congenital blood or lymphatic vessel hamartoma or neoplasm that is visible somewhere

    • Any of the above but not necessarily congenital

    A better FSN for vascular nevus (morphologic abnormality) would be vascular hamartoma (morphologic abnormality). Likewise, a better FSN for congenital vascular nevus (disorder) would be congenital vascular hamartoma (disorder).

    In those cases where common clinical usage of a term containing nevus is unambiguous, there is no need to inactivate the description or the concept.

    Overlapping neoplasm concepts refer to a neoplasm that overlaps two or more adjacent sites. For clarity, the phrase overlapping sites should be included in the descriptions for the FSN and PT for new overlapping neoplasm content.

    For example, 188247000 | Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of bladder (disorder)|

    For modeling an overlapping neoplasm concept, if the concept refers to contiguous sites involving more than one anatomical site, then a separate role group is used for each finding site.

    However, assigning a role group for each finding site does not sufficiently define a concept but merely indicates the presence in both sites of a neoplasm. Where a relevant primitive existing overlapping neoplasm concept is available, this can be used as a stated primitive parent to sufficiently define the concept.

    For example, Sufficiently defined concept 721624000 |Primary adenocarcinoma of overlapping sites of esophagus (disorder)| has a stated primitive parent of 187824009 |Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of digestive system (disorder)|.

    When modeling a congenital neoplasm disorder, the attribute-value relationship of Pathological process (attribute) = Pathological development process (qualifier value) is not used.

    Provide Feedback

    Tumor vs. neoplasm

    Primary malignant neoplasm

    Metastatic malignant neoplasm

    Secondary is no longer the preferred word within the cancer & pathology community of practice; use metastatic.

    See also page

    Use of the term cancer

    Neoplasia

    Neoplasm versus hamartoma

    Nevus

    Overlapping neoplasm

    Do not use overlapping lesion wording.

    Colorectum

    The terms colorectal and colorectum, commonly used by pathologists, are included in descriptions for concepts referring to neoplasms modeled with 1285733009 |Structure of cecum and/or colon and/or rectum (body structure)|. 1285733009 |Structure of cecum and/or colon and/or rectum (body structure)| is needed because neoplasms are the same from the cecum to rectum and are considered as a group in cancer synoptic reporting protocols. Note, there is no consensus concerning the definition of colon in the literature and between different domains.

    Congenital neoplasm

    Neoplasms Observable

    Infectious vs. inflammatory

    Disorders with the suffix "-itis" (e.g., cystitis, prostatitis, tonsillitis, appendicitis) are often infectious as well as inflammatory in nature.

    For inflammatory conditions whose FSNs specify an infective cause , the modeling should include:

    • |Causative agent (attribute)| with the specified organism

    • |Pathological process (attribute)| with the type of infectious process

    • |Associated morphology (attribute)| with Inflammatory morphology or subtype

    • |Finding site (attribute)| with a body structure when known

    For inflammatory conditions whose FSNs do not specify an infective cause, an infectious cause should neither be assumed nor modeled when the FSN does not specify it. The modeling would then exclude a Causative agent and Pathological process and should include only:

    • |Associated morphology (attribute)| of Inflammatory morphology or subtype

    • |Finding site (attribute)| with a body structure when known

    Example of inflammatory and infectious disorder,

    441551009 |Inflammation of larynx caused by virus (disorder)| (synonym, Viral laryngitis) includes a |Causative agent (attribute)| of |Virus (organism)| and a |Pathological process (attribute)| of |Infectious process (qualifier value)|.

    Example of inflammatory disorder not specified as infectious,

    446292002 |Necrotizing inflammation of lymph node (disorder)| (synonym, Necrotizing lymphadenitis) does not specify an infective cause, so it is neither modeled with Causative agent nor Pathological process. The model contains an |Associated morphology (attribute)| and a |Finding site (attribute)|.

    Provide Feedback
    Figure: Stated view of 441551009 |Inflammation of larynx caused by virus (disorder)|
    Figure: Stated view of 446292002 |Necrotizing inflammation of lymph node (disorder)|

    Rheumatoid arthritis

    Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multisystem, inflammatory, autoimmune disorder; the exact etiology is unknown. RA is a disease primarily of the joints and is clinically known as an 'arthritis' although extra-articular manifestations occur. Extra-articular features include nodules, carditis and pericarditis, vasculitis, lung disorders, and other manifestations.

    69896004 |Rheumatoid arthritis (disorder)| remains a primitive concept in SNOMED CT and must be stated as a parent (IS A relationship) for all rheumatoid arthritis concepts.

    For example,

    201776007 |Rheumatoid arthritis of sacroiliac joint (disorder)|

    Figure. Stated view of 201776007 |Rheumatoid arthritis of sacroiliac joint (disorder)|

    Example of extra-articular rheumatoid manifestation,

    28880005 |Rheumatoid arthritis with carditis (disorder)|

    Figure: Stated view of 28880005 |Rheumatoid arthritis with carditis (disorder)|

    410795001 |Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (disorder)| has been inactivated with an inactivation reason of Outdated with a target replacement of 410502007 |Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (disorder)|. Subtypes of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (disorder) are now modeled to reflect the up-to-date classification of this disorder.

    Provide Feedback

    Mental health

    Dependence-related concepts which express the current existence of abuse are acceptable.

    • For example,

      • 191816009 |Drug dependence (disorder)|

    Dependence-related concepts which express the pattern as either continuous or episodic are not acceptable.

    Unacceptable patterns:

    • X with single episode

    • X with multiple episodes

    • Current episode of X

    • First episode of X

    • X with continuous pattern

    Unacceptable legacy concepts:

    • Drug abuse, continuous (disorder)

    • Episodic drug abuse (disorder)

    Concepts describing full or partial remission are acceptable but not the phase of the remission.

    Acceptable patterns:

    • X in full remission

    • X in partial remission

      • For example,

        • 46244001 |Recurrent major depression in full remission (disorder)|

    Unacceptable patterns:

    • X in early full remission

    • X in sustained full remission

    • X in sustained partial remission

    Conditions with associated symptoms should be expressed and modeled like combined disorders. Due to situations are acceptable but not simple Co-occurrent.

    • For example,

      • 703850002 |Delirium due to benzodiazepine withdrawal (disorder)|

    Concepts containing X without Y are considered on a case-by-case basis.

    Acceptable example:

    • 724735003 |Oppositional defiant disorder without chronic irritability-anger (disorder)|

    Unacceptable example:

    • Bipolar type II disorder with current episode moderately depressive without psychotic symptoms

    See also relative page:

    Overdose

    708079007 |Overdose of illicit drug (disorder)| is modeled without a Causative agent because the term "illicit drug" may have differing local interpretations.

    Vaccine-related overdose concepts in the Clinical Finding/Disorder hierarchy were inactivated in the January 2020 Release. They were replaced with concepts in the Event hierarchy, see 788094008 |Excessive dose of vaccine administered (event)| and subtypes.

    When authoring, determine whether the concept describes an overdose, which is a disorder , or the administration or ingestion of an excessive dose, which is an event.

    5703000 |Bipolar disorder in partial remission (disorder)|

    Remission
    Provide Feedback

    Overdose of illicit drug

    Vaccine-related overdose

    Provide Feedback

    Obstruction

    Since an obstruction describes blockage inside the space of a tubular structure, the Finding site of obstruction concepts should be a value from the 113342003 |Structure of lumen of body system (body structure)| subhierarchy.

    For example,

    When modeling gastrointestinal tract obstruction concepts, the Finding site value should be a value from the 432899004 |Structure of lumen of gastrointestinal tract (body structure)| hierarchy as the site obstructed is the lumen of the tract.

    Ischemia

    Ischemic disorders are defined by a morphology of ischemic structural change. This need not be permanent, but it is assumed that all ischemia results in some structural alterations at the molecular level.

    Ischemic heart disease includes myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia (without infarction), angina, and other disorders of the heart that have ischemic structural change (reversible or non-reversible) as a defining characteristic.

    Coronary arteriosclerosis can, of course, be present without causing ischemia, so coronary arteriosclerosis is not a subtype of ischemic heart disease.

    Likewise, there are causes of myocardial ischemia and infarction other than coronary arteriosclerosis, so ischemic heart disease is not a subtype of coronary arteriosclerosis.

    At present, some but not all anatomy content exists to support this model for tracts, ducts and blood vessels beyond the gastrointestinal tract but is expected in the future.

    Provide Feedback

    Ischemic disorder

    Ischemic heart disease

    Provide Feedback

    Malformation, deformation, anomaly

    The word anomaly is, by itself, ambiguous as it may mean either a structural or functional abnormality, depending on the body structure to which it is applied. Concepts using the term anomaly must be evaluated to determine whether it represents a structural or functional abnormality. Using the term "anomaly" in new concept FSNs is not allowed. The terms "structural abnormality" should be used when it is unclear whether the morphology results from malformation or deformation.

    A deformity is a structural abnormality that is due to an extrinsic physical force. Newly created concepts representing a deformity should be considered disorders.

    A malformation is a structural abnormality that results from intrinsically disordered development.

    • For example,

      • Congenital anomaly of is currently modeled as a structural abnormality but is not the same as C ongenital malformation (structural abnormality due to intrinsically disordered development present at birth). Therefore, it can be regarded as having the more general meaning of structural abnormality present at birth.

    When referring to a broad term to denote an intrinsic structural abnormality (e.g., Structural abnormality of fetal bladder) and plan to include 49755003 |Morphologically abnormal structure (morphologic abnormality)| in the model, use the pattern Malformation of fetal X or Congenital malformation of X.

    See other related section in the guide

    • Genetic, developmental, congenital, and physical origin

    • Acquired abnormality of congenital anomaly

    • Congenital

    Provide Feedback

    Death

    Death is an event, not a disorder.

    Sudden cardiac death is a term used in clinical practice. It refers to an arrhythmia that results in sudden loss of cardiac function which, if not quickly reversed, will lead to actual death. The FSN Sudden cardiac death (disorder) is modeled as a subtype of 127337006 |Acute heart disease (disorder)|. It should not be classified as death. Individuals with sudden cardiac death have not necessarily been declared dead and are frequently revived. It is regarded as a subtype of cardiac dysrhythmia.

    Sudden cardiac death

    Provide Feedback

    Combining Morphologic Abnormalities

    When modeling a concept requiring two role groups with the same body structure but two different morphologies (because a combined morphology does not exist), then those morphologic abnormalities can be combined to create a single morphologic abnormality concept. Keep the newly-created morphologic abnormality concept primitive, as all morphologic abnormality concepts are primitive.

    For example

    Disorder concept

    Associated morphology

    Associated morphology

    Combined Associated morphology

    Another example is 1076491000119102 |Nontraumatic complete rupture of muscle or tendon structure of rotator cuff of left shoulder (disorder)|.

    If this disorder had the same finding site of |Structure of rotator cuff of left shoulder (body structure)| with two different morphologic abnormalities of |Nontraumatic rupture| and |Complete rupture|, then those two morphologic abnormality concepts can be combined to create a single, primitive, morphologic abnormality concept of |Nontraumatic complete rupture (morphologic abnormality)|. This will prevent modeling with two relationship groups.

    Instead of modeling as in this stated view:

    Model as shown in this stated view:

    Calcified hematoma of head (disorder)

    Pathologic calcification, calcified structure (morphologic abnormality)

    Hematoma (morphologic abnormality)

    Calcified hematoma (morphologic abnormality)

    Provide Feedback

    Pulmonary embolism

    Pulmonary embolus (PE) refers to obstruction of the pulmonary artery or one of its branches by material (e.g. thrombus, tumor, air, or fat) that originated elsewhere in the body. When modeling embolism disorder concepts with pulmonary in the FSN, the Finding site is 782966009 |Structure of artery of pulmonary circulation (body structure)|.

    Provide Feedback

    Remission

    Disorder in remission

    < X> disorder in remission concepts require a stated relationship to the appropriate primitive Disorder in remission supertype, in addition to the appropriate supertype for the disorder.

    For example,

    16270831000119107 |Bulimia nervosa in partial remission (disorder)| has stated parents of 698698008 |Bulimia nervosa in remission (disorder)| and 765207007 |Disorder in partial remission (disorder)|.

    Figure: Stated view of 16270831000119107 |Bulimia nervosa in partial remission (disorder)|

    Where the primitive supertype for the disorder is |Disease (disorder)|, only the Disorder in remission supertype will be required.

    For example,

    91856007 |Acute lymphoid leukemia in remission (disorder)| has only one stated parent of 765205004 |Disorder in remission (disorder)|, because a potential supertype of 64572001 |Disease (disorder)| would be unnecessary.

    See also relative section:

    Mental health

    Provide Feedback
    Figure: Stated view of 91856007 |Acute lymphoid leukemia in remission (disorder)|

    Substance withdrawal syndrome

    The concepts in the 1254795002 |Substance withdrawal syndrome (disorder)| subhierarchy are modeled as direct children of 64572001 |Disease (disorder)| and are further defined using Due to and After attributes of | dependance (disorder)|.

    For example,

    74934004 |Psychoactive substance withdrawal syndrome (disorder) has a stated proximal primitive parent of Disease (disorder) and Due to and After attributes of Psychoactive substance dependence (disorder).

    Stated view of 74934004 |Psychoactive substance withdrawal syndrome (disorder)|:

    Inferred view of 74934004 |Psychoactive substance withdrawal syndrome (disorder)|:

    Provide Feedback

    Specific Clinical finding and Disorder Modeling

    • Acquired abnormality of congenital anomaly

    • Adverse reaction to X vaccine

    • Allergy to X vaccine

    • Arrythmia

    Bacterial disorders with organism or toxin
    Combining Morphologic Abnormalities
    Congenital
    Death
    Enteritis
    Genetic, developmental, congenital, and physical origin
    Hematologic and lymphatic conditions
    Hernia
    Iatrogenic
    Immune function disorders
    Infectious vs. inflammatory
    Ischemia
    Lesion
    Malformation, deformation, anomaly
    Maternal, fetal, neonatal
    Measurement findings
    Mental health
    Multisystem disorders
    Neoplasm
    Null values
    Obstruction
    Osteoarthritis
    Overdose
    Pneumonia vs. Pneumonitis
    Poisoning
    Pressure ulcer Pressure injury
    Pulmonary embolism
    Remission
    Rheumatoid arthritis
    Substance withdrawal syndrome
    Trauma and Injury
    Provide Feedback

    Bacterial disorders with organism or toxin

    In modeling some bacterial disorders, there will be situations where either the organism or the toxin (substance), or both values, are required for the causative agent attribute. The decision is often determined by whether or not the bacteria are considered endotoxins or exotoxins. The most common exotoxins are:

    • Botulinum Toxin

      • Enterotoxin

      • Cholera Toxin

      • Diphtheria Toxin

      • Tetanospasmin

    Exotoxins are more lethal in comparison to endotoxins, but there are vaccines against many exotoxins whereas there are no vaccines against endotoxins. There can be instances where an infection is present but the disease-causing toxins are not; in this case, model the concept only with the organism and not the toxin substance.

    Example,

    • 276202003 |Infection caused by Clostridium tetani (disorder)| is modeled with a causative agent of 30917009 |Clostridium tetani (organism)| only.

    In the situation where a disease is caused by both the infection and the associated toxin, model with both the causative agent and the toxin substance.

    Example,

    • 76902006 |Tetanus (disorder)| is modeled with a causative agent of 30917009 |Clostridium tetani (organism)| as well as 26159005 |Clostridium tetani toxin (substance)|.

    Provide Feedback

    Clinical Finding Defining Attributes

    Self-grouped Attributes

    Generally, the attributes associated with , before , during , after , due to , clinical course , or temporally related to are self-grouped, meaning they must not be placed in a relationship group with other attributes; each attribute must be the only attribute in a relationship group. Any rare exceptions will be documented within the individual attribute section below.

    The grouped column from the Clinical Finding Attributes Summary table on the previous page correctly indicates that these attributes are put into a relationship group during classification because they are self-grouped.

    The following defining attributes correspond to the Clinical Finding/Disorder Attributes Summary table.

    After

    This attribute is used to model concepts in which a clinical finding occurs after another clinical finding, procedure or event. Neither asserting nor excluding a causal relationship, it instead emphasizes a sequence of events. This attribute is self-grouped.

    For example,

    • 123948009 |Post-viral disorder (disorder)| occurs | After (attribute)| 34014006 | Viral disease (disorder)|

    A clinical finding may start either: after a variable period of time; immediately following the resolution of its antecedent; or during the course of its antecedent but continue after the antecedent has resolved. These sequences correspond to Allen's interval algebra relations of:

    • X takes place before Y

    • X meets Y

    • X overlaps with Y

    This attribute specifies the morphologic changes seen at the tissue or cellular level that are characteristic of a disease.

    (Please see Morphologic Abnormalities vs. Findings for details).

    For example,

    • 75694006 | Pancreatitis (disorder)| has an Associated morphology (attribute) of 409774005 |Inflammatory morphology (morphologic abnormality)|

    When selecting a value for this attribute, in general, the concept should not represent a body structure combined with the morphology. There are, however, exceptions, i.e. where a morphology implies the finding site:

    For example,

    • Thymoma (morphologic abnormality)

    • External hyperostosis (morphologic abnormality)

    • Odontoma (morphologic abnormality)

    Body structure should be captured in the value selected for the Finding site attribute. There are, however, exceptions.

    For example,

    • 70529004 | Lymphoid hyperplasia of appendix (disorder)| has | Associated morphology (attribute)| of 43961000 | Lymphoid hyperplasia (morphologic abnormality)| and a | Finding site (attribute)| of 45679000 | Appendiceal lymphoid nodule (body structure)|

    47429007 | Associated with (attribute)| represents a clinically relevant association between concepts without either asserting or excluding a causal or sequential relationship between the two. In general, avoid using the 47429007 | Associated with (attribute)| as it may be ambiguous and difficult to apply consistently.

    This attribute is self-grouped.

    Areas of content that use this attribute:

    • Devices

    • Intolerance to substances

    • Concepts that group specific associations

    For example,

    • 6211002 | Polyarthritis associated with another disorder (disorder)|

    This attribute is used to model pre-procedure complications (e.g., preoperative complication). It represents temporal associations between procedures and related disorders. This attribute is self-grouped.

    This attribute identifies an organism, substance, physical object, physical force, and/or pharmaceutical/biological product as the direct cause of a condition. It does not include vectors, for example, a mosquito that transmits malaria.

    For example,

    • 4989003 |Electrical burn of skin (disorder)| has the 246075003 |Causative agent (attribute)| of 18213006 |Electricity (physical force)|

    The following guidelines should be considered where the causative agent is a substance:

    Concepts representing a clinical finding caused by a base substance (e.g., 836284001 |Pentamethonium (substance)|), a substance structure grouper (e.g. 1149501006 |Substance with ether structure (substance)|), or a substance disposition grouper (e.g. 404642006 |Substance with opioid receptor agonist mechanism of action (substance)|) should be modeled using a causative agent that is a descendant of 105590001 |Substance (substance)|. Classification results are expected to be consistent with the modeling in the Substance hierarchy.

    For example,

    • 93419003 |Contact dermatitis caused by nickel (disorder)|

    • 13503000 |Poisoning caused by naloxone (disorder)|

    • 767116002 |Allergy to substance with ether structure (finding)|

    • 870376001 |Adverse reaction to dopamine receptor agonist (disorder)|

    Concepts representing a clinical finding caused by a substance modification (e.g., 82485006 |Pentamethonium bromide (substance)|) are generally not allowed. Exceptions may be included if the condition caused by the substance modification is significantly different from the one caused by the base substance. Exceptions may include liposome or lipid complex substances, pegylated substances, or salt forms:

    For example,

    • 293908005 |Allergy to chloral hydrate (finding)|

    • 296213007 |Fluphenazine decanoate overdose (disorder)|

    This attribute is used to represent both the course and onset of a disease or condition. This attribute is self-grouped.

    For example,

    • 74973004 |Chronic fibrosing pancreatitis (disorder)| has a 263502005 |Clinical course (attribute)| of 90734009 |Chronic (qualifier value)|

    The clinical course value is added when appropriate to the condition and thus specified in the FSN. The distinction is often necessary in those conditions that can have either an acute or a chronic course, such as bronchitis. For those conditions that have only one clinical course, i.e. diabetes is a chronic disease, a wider discussion is necessary before a decision can be made whether to assign a clinical course. Decisions on these concepts are currently made on a case-by-case basis.

    Many conditions with acute (sudden) onsets also have acute (short-term) courses. Few conditions with chronic (long-term) durations require rapid versus gradual onset subtyping. Thus, there is no clear need for separating the rapidity of onset from the duration of a disease. The clinical course attribute, which combines onset and course, has been more reproducible and useful than two attributes that attempt to separate the meanings.

    This attribute is used to identify a clinical finding/disorder, event, or procedure concept as the direct cause of another Clinical finding or Disorder concept. If the clinical finding merely predisposes to another disorder, rather than causing it directly, the more general |Associated with (attribute)| is used instead.

    This attribute is self-grouped.

    For example,

    • 43959009 |Cataract of eye due to diabetes mellitus (disorder)|

    This attribute is used to model concepts in which a clinical finding occurs during a procedure. Neither asserting nor excluding a causal relationship, it instead emphasizes a sequence of events. This attribute is self-grouped.

    For example,

    • 10901000087102 |Hypotension during surgery (disorder)| has the value Surgical procedure (procedure) for During (attribute)

    This attribute is used to represent episodes of care provided by a physician or other healthcare provider, not episodes of disease experienced by the patient.

    For example,

    • Asthma with 246456000 |Episodicity (attribute)| of 255217005 |First episode (qualifier value)| represents the first time the patient presents to their healthcare provider with asthma.

    This attribute specifies the person or other entity from which the clinical finding information was obtained. It is not about the particular individual but about the category or type of informer. It is used to differentiate patient-reported symptoms from provider-determined signs.

    This attribute specifies the means by which a clinical finding was determined. It includes findings that were determined by examination of the patient.

    For example,

    • 713071004 |Alcohol misuser in household (finding)| has the 418775008 |Finding method (attribute)| of 84100007 |History taking (procedure)|

    This attribute specifies the body site affected by a condition.

    For example,

    • 90708001 |Kidney disease (disorder)| has 363698007 |Finding site (attribute)| of 64033007 |Kidney structure (body structure)|

    This attribute represents a recognized association between a disorder (or clinical finding) and a gene, where the gene is implicated in the condition but is not itself the anatomical site of the abnormality. This relationship does not assert a specific causal mechanism and may represent causative, susceptibility, modifying, or otherwise biologically relevant involvement.

    This attribute represents a pathological physiological state in which a substance or cell type is present in insufficient quantity or activity in the subject.

    This attribute represents a pathological physiological state in which a substance or cell type is present in excessive quantity or activity in the subject.

    This attribute refers to and designates the judgment aspect being evaluated or interpreted (e.g., presence, absence, degree, normality, abnormality, etc.). Subtypes of Environment or geographical location (environment / location) can also be used as the value in cases such as specifying a location of an incident to be reported to death and injury registries.

    Interprets and Has Interpretation are grouped together in a relationship group without any other attributes.

    For example,

    Qualifier values of |Below reference range| and |Above reference range| are preferred over values such as high/low, increased/decreased, etc. to describe Measurement finding (finding) concepts.

    This attribute refers to the entity being evaluated or interpreted, when an evaluation, interpretation, or judgment is intrinsic to the meaning of a concept.

    Interprets and Has Interpretation are grouped together in a relationship group without any other attributes. Interprets may be used in a relationship group by itself without any other attributes if the value of the observable is not defined.

    For example,

    In general, the value for the |Interprets| attribute should be from the |Observable entity| hierarchy rather than the |Procedure| hierarchy.

    |Observable entity| concepts that are modeled with a |Scale type (attribute)| relationship should not be used as a value for a Clinical finding's |Interprets| relationship. The existing vital sign |Observable entity| concepts, e.g. |Arterial blood pressure (observable entity)| are exceptions to this guideline; they are permitted for use.

    Be aware that SNOMED CT currently contains some concepts in the |Evaluation Procedure| hierarchy which logically belong in the |Observable entity| hierarchy. Reconciliation of the overlap between these two hierarchies will be undertaken at a future date. Discussions about the final solution for the |Observable entity| and |Evaluation Procedure| issue are ongoing. See .

    When working with the Interprets attribute, consider the values used by the supertypes and possible subtypes of your concept for this attribute. This is because the |Interprets| values must be drawn from the same hierarchy, e.g., |Observable entity| hierarchy or |Procedure| hierarchy as supertypes and subtypes, to support modeling and correct subsumption.

    This attribute is used to specify the process or activity that is the consequence of realization of the function.

    This attribute refers to the specific period of life during which a condition first presents. However, conditions may persist beyond the period of life when they first present.

    For example,

    • 192611004 |Childhood phobic anxiety disorder (disorder)| has the [246454002 |Occurrence (attribute)| of 255398004 |Childhood (qualifier value)|

    This attribute provides information about the underlying pathological process of a disorder, i.e. it describes the process that results in the structural or morphologic change.

    441862004 |Infectious process (qualifier value)| and its subtype 442614005 |Parasitic process (qualifier value)| are included in the range for 370135005 |Pathological process (attribute)| . These are used in modeling the 40733004 |Infectious disease (disorder)| subhierarchy.

    • For example,

      • 17322007 |Disease caused by parasite (disorder)| has the 370135005 |Pathological process (attribute)| of 442614005 |Parasitic process (qualifier value)|

    370135005 |Pathological process (attribute)| must not be used for values that could overlap with 116676008 |Associated morphology (attribute)|.

    • For example,

      • Inflammatory processes result in inflammation (by definition), but these disorders should be defined by their morphology, i.e., 708039003 |Inflammatory lesion (morphologic abnormality)|

    Disorders which involve congenital anomalies are defined with the following grouped attribute-value pairs:

    • Occurrence (attribute) = congenital (qualifier value)

    • Associated morphology (attribute) = << 49755003 |Morphologically abnormal structure (morphologic abnormality)|

    • Pathological process (attribute) = pathological development process (qualifier value)

    • Finding site = X (body structure)

    This attribute is used to subclass a Clinical finding concept according to its severity. However, this use is relative , i.e. it is incorrect to assume that the disease intensity or hazard is the same for all clinical findings to which this attribute is applied.

    The 246112005 |Severity (attribute)| may be applied to subtypes of Clinical finding (excluding << Symptom severity (finding)) to represent the severity of a finding or disease.

    While this attribute is useful to create subtypes of specific concepts and to differentiate the severity of a single disorder, it is not commonly used, and care must be taken when applying it. This is because:

    • Severity may be interpreted in different ways, depending on the set of values available. Consider the different meaning of severity in each of the following value sets:

      • mild / moderate / severe

      • minimal / mild / moderate / severe / very severe

      • mild / mild to moderate / moderate / moderate to severe / severe / life threatening / fatal

    The Severity attribute is not applied to subtypes of 162465004 |Symptom severity (finding)| because the severity of a symptom is different to the severity of a disease. Please note this piece of guidance does not align with the MRCM but is an editorial guideline.

    726633004 |Temporally related to (attribute)| applies to perioperative complications and clinical findings where there is no causal relationship but a time-relative association exists.

    This attribute's subhierarchy specifies the associated time period (i.e. before, during, after) between two clinical findings, e.g., |Pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19|; or between a clinical finding and a procedure, e.g., perioperative complications temporally related to a surgical procedure (i.e. preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative).

    This attribute is self-grouped.

    Severity is defined relative to the expected degree of intensity or hazard of the Clinical finding that is being qualified. For example, the common cold has a baseline intensity or hazard that is much less than a more serious disease like lupus erythematosus or pneumonia; thus, a severe cold might be considered less intense or less hazardous than mild pneumonia.

  • Some disorders that are life-threatening do not ordinarily have a severity assigned to them. Cancer, for example, is not usually described as mild, moderate, or severe, but rather by stage or grade.

  • Associated morphology

    Associated with

    Before

    Causative agent

    Although Pharmaceutical / biologic product (product) and its descendants are considered valid values for Causative agent (attribute) by the MRCM, they are not currently used as values for this attribute in the International Release. The only exception is 787859002 |Vaccine product (medicinal product)| and its descendants, which can be used as valid values for this attribute.

    Clinical course

    The word acute

    The word acute has more than one meaning, and the meanings are often overlapping or unclear. It may imply rapid onset, short duration, or high severity; in some circumstances it might be used to mean all of these. For morphological concepts, acute may also imply the kind of morphology associated with the speed of onset.

    • For example,

      • 4532008 |Acute inflammation (morphologic abnormality)| does not necessarily have a clinical course of sudden onset and/or short duration, but rather implies polymorphonuclear infiltration (84499006 |Chronic inflammation (morphologic abnormality) | implies mononuclear cell infiltration, not necessarily a chronic course, although inflammation with a chronic course is highly correlated with a lymphocytic infiltration)

    2704003 |Acute disease (disorder)| is modeled with a Clinical course (attribute) of Sudden onset AND/OR short duration (qualifier value). For clinical conditions that necessitate further specificity, the more appropriate subtypes are available. Acute onset and sudden onset are synonymous; clinical conditions specifying acute onset should be modeled with a Clinical course (attribute) of Sudden onset (qualifier value).

    Acute-on-chronic (qualifier value) is an acute (sudden onset) event superimposed on a pre-existing chronic condition. This be either a sudden worsening of a chronic condition itself (an exacerbation) or the development of a new, separate acute illness on top of a chronic disease.

    Due to

    During

    Episodicity

    Modeling

    Episodicity is not used to model any concepts precoordinated in the International Release, but it can be used as a qualifier in postcoordination.

    Finding informer

    Finding method

    Finding site

    Has associated gene

    Has deficiency of

    Has excess of

    Has interpretation

    Interprets

    In the guidance on the use of the |Scale type (attribute)|, it has been noted that going forward, international |Observable entity| concepts will not be modeled with the |Scale type (attribute)|. Extension concepts are permitted to add specific subtypes of observable entities that include the |Scale type (attribute)|, if desired.

    Measurement finding

    For concepts in the 118245000 |Measurement finding (finding)| subhierarchy, the value for 363714003 |Interprets (attribute)| can be an Evaluation procedure, Laboratory procedure, or an Observable entity concept. In the future, the range of values may change when discussion of the relationship between evaluation procedures and observable entities concludes.

    Has realization

    Modeling Allergy to X

    Allergy to X is modeled with 719722006 |Has realization (attribute)| of 472964009 |Allergic process (qualifier value)| and 246075003 |Causative agent (attribute)| of 105590001 |Substance (substance)| . Find the allergy template at the Clinical finding/disorder templates page for more information including exceptions.

    Occurrence

    Modeling

    Multiple values of 246454002 |Occurrence (attribute)| for a single concept are not desirable. They will be addressed in a future release.

    Pathological process

    Modeling

    Congenital X morphology concepts should not be used. They may be used only if there is not a non-congenital supertype.

    Severity

    Modeling

    Generally, |Severity (attribute)| is not used to model concepts precoordinated in the International Release, but there are some exceptions.

    Non-standardized or locally defined severity values will not be recognized or supported in SNOMED CT. However, severity values explicitly defined and standardized by an internationally recognized standard are acceptable. A valid exception requires an internationally accepted definition that can be consistently applied and used reliably for international comparison. Even though a reference may be internationally sourced, its use may not always be uniformly applied by multiple countries. Classifications of severity that represent variation in clinical presentations and enact limitations with age ranges, sex, or pregnancy status, do not apply universally to all patients of all ages, prove problematic, and may not be generally useful.

    As an alternative to pre-coordination in the international release, this severity attribute can be used as a qualifier in postcoordination. However, beware that postcoordination of severity results in the same irreproducibility issues as pre-coordination.

    Temporally related to

    Observable Entity vs. Evaluation procedure
    Provide Feedback
    Stated view of Lymphoid hyperplasia of appendix (disorder)
    Stated view of 6211002 |Polyarthritis associated with another disorder (disorder)| using the |Associated with (attribute)|
    Inferred view of Inadequate intake of vitamin D and vitamin D derivative (finding)
    Stated view of |Decreased muscle tone (finding)|

    Clinical Finding and Disorder Attributes Summary

    When authoring in this domain, these are the approved attributes and allowable ranges.

    See also the respective templates.

    Domain Information for Clinical Finding

    Property
    Value

    Domain Constraint

    << 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) |

    Attribute
    Grouped
    Cardinality
    In Group Cardinality
    Range Constraint
    Property
    Value
    Attribute
    Grouped
    Cardinality
    In Group Cardinality
    Range Constraint

    Parent Domain

    -

    Proximal Primitive Constraint

    << 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) |

    Proximal Primitive Refinement

    -

    255234002 | After (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    Domain Constraint

    << 64572001 |Disease (disorder)|

    Parent Domain

    -

    Proximal Primitive Constraint

    129453003 |Has deficiency of (attribute)|

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    Author View of Attributes and Ranges for Clinical Finding

    Domain Information for Disorder

    Author View of Attributes and Ranges for Disorder

    Provide Feedback

    0..1

    << 272379006 | Event (event) | OR << 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) | OR << 71388002 | Procedure (procedure) |

    116676008 | Associated morphology (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 49755003 | Morphologically abnormal structure (morphologic abnormality) |

    47429007 | Associated with (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..*

    << 105590001 | Substance (substance) | OR << 260787004 | Physical object (physical object) | OR << 272379006 | Event (event) | OR << 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) | OR << 410607006 | Organism (organism) | OR << 71388002 | Procedure (procedure) | OR << 78621006 | Physical force (physical force) |

    288556008 | Before (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 71388002 | Procedure (procedure) |

    246075003 | Causative agent (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 105590001 | Substance (substance) | OR << 260787004 | Physical object (physical object) | OR << 373873005 | Pharmaceutical / biologic product (product) | OR << 410607006 | Organism (organism) | OR << 78621006 | Physical force (physical force) |

    263502005 | Clinical course (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 288524001 | Courses (qualifier value) |

    42752001 | Due to (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 272379006 | Event (event) | OR << 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) | OR << 71388002 | Procedure (procedure) |

    371881003 | During (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 71388002 | Procedure (procedure) |

    246456000 | Episodicity (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 288526004 | Episodicities (qualifier value) |

    419066007 | Finding informer (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 419358007 | Subject of record or other provider of history (person) | OR << 420158005 | Performer of method (person) | OR << 444018008 | Person with characteristic related to subject of record (person) |

    418775008 | Finding method (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 71388002 | Procedure (procedure) |

    363698007 | Finding site (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 442083009 | Anatomical or acquired body structure (body structure) |

    1395996007 |Has associated gene (attribute)|

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 382391000210108 |Gene structure (cell structure)|

    363713009 | Has interpretation (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 260245000 | Finding value (qualifier value) | OR << 263714004 | Colors (qualifier value) | OR << 308916002 | Environment or geographical location (environment / location) |

    719722006 | Has realization (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 272379006 | Event (event) | OR << 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) | OR << 71388002 | Procedure (procedure) | OR << 719982003 | Process (qualifier value) |

    363714003 | Interprets (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 108252007 | Laboratory procedure (procedure) | OR << 363787002 | Observable entity (observable entity) | OR << 386053000 | Evaluation procedure (procedure) |

    246454002 | Occurrence (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 282032007 | Periods of life (qualifier value) |

    370135005 | Pathological process (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 1495041000004108 | Proliferation of neoplasm (qualifier value) | OR << 308490002 | Pathological developmental process (qualifier value) | OR << 441862004 | Infectious process (qualifier value) | OR << 472963003 | Hypersensitivity process (qualifier value) | OR << 769247005 | Abnormal immune process (qualifier value) |

    246112005 | Severity (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    << 272141005 | Severities (qualifier value) |

    726633004 | Temporally related to (attribute) |

    1

    0..*

    0..*

    << 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) | OR << 71388002 | Procedure (procedure) |

    << 64572001 |Disease (disorder)|

    Proximal Primitive Refinement

    -

    < 105590001 |Substance (substance)| or < 4421005 |Cell structure (cell structure)|

    1395997003 |Has excess of (attribute)|

    1

    0..*

    0..1

    < 105590001 |Substance (substance)| or < 4421005 |Cell structure (cell structure)|

    Poisoning

    When modeling poisoning disorders, ensure that the disorder being described is caused by the substance or active ingredient in the product selected as the causative agent (attribute) value. Do not add poisoning disorders if the causative agent is a product constituent (e.g. adjuvant, carrier, preservative, flavoring, stabilizer, or other inactive ingredient) that cannot be identified as the causative agent.

    Vaccine-related poisoning concepts have been inactivated.

    Provide Feedback

    Osteoarthritis

    396275006 |Osteoarthritis (disorder)| is primarily a degenerative disease, although recent research has identified an increased role of inflammation as an inciting cause. Because of this, 396275006 |Osteoarthritis (disorder)| should now be modeled with a morphology that represents both the inflammatory and degenerative aspects of the disease, 1343602002 |Degeneration and inflammation (morphologic abnormality)|. According to many authoritative sources, osteoarthritis is now regarded as an inflammatory disease, and is now a subtype of arthritis.

    SNOMED International uses a number of primary authoritative sources to guide the definition of concepts. For the disease hierarchy, UpToDate (Uptodate.com) is used as a primary authoritative source. As of November 2024, according to this site, “In the past, οѕteоаrthritiѕ (ՕΑ) was considered to be simply a degenerative "wear and tear" process and therefore often misnamed as degenerative joint disease. However, the pathogenesis of ՕΑ is much more complex than just wear and tear and the term "οѕteоarthritis," where "-itis" is indicative of an inflammatory process, is indeed correct .” Additional recent academic articles also confirm the inflammatory nature of OA.

    • https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/46/5/251

    Pressure ulcer Pressure injury

    |Pressure injury (disorder)| has been created in SNOMED CT based on the recommendations of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) and adopted for the 2019 International Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. The NPIAP nomenclature favors the use of pressure injury over pressure ulcer , due to confusion around the use of ulcer for two of the pressure ulcer stages which actually occur in intact skin.

    New morphologies with text definitions have been created representing the various pressure injury stages:

    • |Damage (morphologic abnormality)|

    • |Pressure injury (morphologic abnormality)|

    https://journals.lww.com/co-rheumatology/abstract/2023/03000/inflammation_in_osteoarthritis__the_latest.9.aspx
    https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/3/1710
    Provide Feedback

    |Pressure injury stage I (morphologic abnormality)|

  • |Pressure injury stage II (morphologic abnormality)|

  • |Pressure injury stage III (morphologic abnormality)|

  • |Pressure injury stage IV (morphologic abnormality)|

  • |Deep tissue pressure injury (morphologic abnormality)|

  • 1163215007 |Pressure injury (disorder)|and its descendants representing the pressure injury stages are defined with the morphologies above, similar to how burn injuries have been modeled in SNOMED CT.

    • Pressure injury morphology stages II - V have been assigned an additional parent of 56208002 |Ulcer (morphologic abnormality) |

    • Pressure injury morphology stage I has been assigned an additional parent of 70819003 |Erythema (morphologic abnormality) |

    • Pressure injury disorder concepts representing stages II - IV have a synonym of Pressure ulcer stage x

    The following concepts have been inactivated and replaced with corresponding Pressure injury concepts:

    • 421076008 |Pressure ulcer stage 1 (disorder)|

    • 420324007 |Pressure ulcer stage 2 (disorder)|

    • 421927004 |Pressure ulcer stage 3 (disorder)|

    • 420597008 |Pressure ulcer stage 4 (disorder)|

    • 421594008 |Nonstageable pressure ulcer (disorder)|

    • 165260000 |Deep pressure ulcer (disorder)|

    723071003 |Pressure injury of deep tissue (disorder)| has previously been created but has been remodeled according to the above heuristics.

    399912005 |Pressure ulcer (disorder)| has been inactivated and the remaining 33 descendants that do not mention a specific stage have been renamed using Pressure injury instead of pressure ulcer with the value of associated morphology value changed from 420226006 |Pressure ulcer (morphologic abnormality)| to 1163214006 |Pressure injury (morphologic abnormality)|. This results in these concepts being relocated under |Pressure injury (disorder)|.

    Provide Feedback

    Summary

    The NPIAP classification best supports the disambiguation of pressure ulcer from intact skin lesions. The SNOMED CT pressure injury disorder hierarchy follows the NPIAP terminology most closely but accommodates legacy classifications by including an ulcer morphology in the model as well as additional descriptions of pressure ulcer for pressure injury stages II - VI.

    Hematologic and lymphatic conditions

    Hematologic, lymphatic

    There is more than one meaning of hematologic. A definition based on hematological system _ structure includes hematopoietic and lymphoid structures (including bone marrow, spleen, thymus, lymph nodes, etc), as well as the cellular components of blood. Hematologic neoplasms clearly fit this definition.

    A definition based on clinical usage by hematologists is broader. Disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis are often managed by hematologists, but these do not have a common structural overlap with the lymphoid and hematopoietic systems (with the exception of platelets and megakaryocytes). For clarity, hematologic disorder is a navigational concept that is used to define a reference set that includes disorders of blood and blood forming organs, as well as disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis, depending on what is intended.

    Hematologic disorders, lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms

    Hematologic disorders may refer to disorders of: hematopoietic cell origin; blood forming organs (bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen, thymus, and other lymph tissues); cellular components of blood; or function of hemostatic and thrombotic systems.

    Diseases of the blood forming organs (bone marrow, lymph nodes, etc.) can be defined by any one or a combination of the following:

    The morphology (neoplastic diseases, at a minimum, include those morphologies covered by neoplasms in the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, ICD-O).

    For example,

    • 118599009 |Hodgkin's disease (disorder)| has 128930002 |Hodgkin lymphoma - category (morphologic abnormality)|. The body site involved (especially specific lymph node groups or skin sites).

    For example,

    • 400122007 |Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (disorder)| has Finding site, skin structure (body structure)

    For some disorders, like T-cell lymphomas, and plasma cell and immunosecretory disorders, it is important to distinguish those defined by morphology, site, or manifestation.

    T-cell lymphomas can be subcategorized according to the primary site, a lymph node, the skin, or other extranodal site. This means that a site of lymphoid structure cannot be the defining characteristic of the parent concept T-cell lymphoma. Its defining attribute should be morphology alone.

    Plasma cell and immunosecretory disorders (e.g. monoclonal gammopathy, heavy chain disease, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia) are defined by their manifestations, i.e. the type of monoclonal protein they secrete. Others (e.g. myeloma, plasmacytoma) are defined by their morphology, regardless of whether or not they are secretory.

    Immunosecretory disorders may have a morphology of plasma cell neoplasm , even though no mass has been identified and the monoclonal protein may be the only evidence that there is a clonal neoplasm.

    In general, lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms can be modeled with their morphologies, but without a site. Leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes are modeled with Finding Site, bone marrow structure (body structure).

    There is more than one meaning of coagulation. A broad meaning, to stop bleeding, is better described as hemostasis. A more narrow definition, limited to the formation of the fibrin clot, might exclude certain components of hemostasis (e.g the ability to stop hemorrhage through the actions of blood vessels, collagen, endothelial cells, and platelets, in the absence of clotting). Individuals with congenital fibrinogen deficiency cannot form fibrin clots, yet their bodies are able to stop bleeding. Therefore, coagulation disorders are kinds of hemostatic disorders.

    Coagulation, hemostasis, thrombosis

    Provide Feedback

    Immune function disorders

    Hypersensitivity

    473010000 |Hypersensitivity condition (finding)| is a primitive concept. It subsumes 473011001 |Allergic condition (finding)| and 609405001 |Non-allergic hypersensitivity condition (finding)|.

    473010000 |Hypersensitivity condition (finding)| is a direct descendant of 404684003 |Clinical finding (finding)|.

    473011001 |Allergic condition (finding)| and 609405001 |Non-allergic hypersensitivity condition (finding)| are both primitive concepts. Each has three main subhierarchies representing:

    • Diseases/disorders: abnormal structures

    • Processes: allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reactions

    • Dispositions: propensities to develop allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reactions; they do not have pathophysiologic manifestations prior to allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) processes, i.e. reactions

    Diseases/disorders and reactions, but not dispositions, are defined by underlying pathological processes.

    Allergic reaction (disorder) has a Causative agent (attribute) of Substance (substance) or its subtypes. This attribute-value pair is grouped with another attribute-value pair of Pathological process (attribute) and Allergic process (qualifier value).

    Allergic process (qualifier value) is a subtype of Abnormal immune process (qualifier value) which means allergic disorders, as well as autoimmune disorders, classify as types of disorders of immune function. Disorder of immune function (disorder) modeling with Abnormal immune process (qualifier value) allows allergic and autoimmune disorders to correctly classify as subtypes of Disorder of immune function (disorder).

    Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) diseases represent manifestations of pathologic processes that result in abnormal structures. Modeling an allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) disease includes the following relationship group:

    • IS A: Disease (disorder)

    • Associated morphology (attribute): subtype of Morphologically abnormal structure (morphologic abnormality) representing the abnormal structure

    • Finding site (attribute): subtype of Anatomical or acquired body structure (body structure) representing the abnormal structure

    • Pathological process: Hypersensitivity process (qualifier value) or one of its descendants

    For example,

    Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) dispositions are propensities to develop allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reactions; they do not have pathophysiologic manifestations prior to reactions. They are considered clinical findings, not disorders. This further distinguishes them from allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reactions.

    Allergy to X (finding) will have the following modeling:

    IS A: Propensity to adverse reaction (finding)

    Role group of:

    Has realization (attribute): Allergic process (qualifier value)

    Causative agent (attribute): subtype of Substance (substance)

    For example,

    For example,

    Nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reactions are adverse reactions; they are defined by an underlying pathological process.

    For example,

    Figure: Example of nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reaction model in stated view

    An intolerance is the propensity to develop an adverse reaction to a substance. The adverse reaction may be associated with various pathological processes, but specifically excludes hypersensitivity reactions.

    It may be difficult to define the pathological process and to associate the substance with the propensity to develop a reaction. Consequently, 47429007 |Associated with (attribute)| is used to model intolerance to substances.

    For example,

    Pneumonia vs. Pneumonitis

    The terms pneumonia and pneumonitis are often used interchangeably. In SNOMED CT, pneumonia is used for infectious causes, and pneumonitis is used for noninfectious causes.

    Some concepts may contain a synonym with the other pneumoni- term due to high/common usage in medical literature.

    Pneumonia is a type of pneumonitis, as inflammation is present in both. The distinguishing feature between the two disorders is the presence of infection in pneumonia. Pneumonia has a Pathological process (attribute) of Infectious process (qualifier value); pneumonitis does not.

    Figure: Stated view of 205237003 |Pneumonitis (disorder)|
    Figure: Stated view of 233604007 |Pneumonia (disorder)|

    Morphologic abnormality

    The morphologic abnormality for both 233604007 |Pneumonia (disorder)| and 205237003 |Pneumonitis (disorder)| is 409774005 |Inflammatory morphology (morphologic abnormality)|.

    The clinically-warranted morphologic abnormality for many subtypes of pneumonia is 707496003 |Inflammation and consolidation (morphologic abnormality)|. Consolidation is a feature of most forms of pneumonia; however, it may not be a feature of all pneumonias, such as atypical pneumonias.

    Guidance exception

    Content has been added that aligns with the 2025 International Multidisciplinary Classification of the Interstitial Pneumonias with attribution to ERS/ATS - European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society. For these concepts, the fully specified term and preferred term align with the classification which uses the term pneumonia instead of pneumonitis, even in the absence of an infectious cause.

    Hernia

    Hernias involve two body structures, one is the hernial opening and the other is the herniated structure. When modeling hernias, use two role groups to represent the body structures and the respective associated morphology for each site. If the herniated structure is not explicit, use the supertype concept for the finding site.

    For example,

    The concept 50063009 |Femoral hernia (disorder)| is modeled with Finding site = 818983003 |Structure of abdominopelvic cavity and/or content of abdominopelvic cavity and/or anterior abdominal wall (body structure)| to represent the herniated structure.

    Figure : Stated view of Femoral hernia (disorder)

    Provide Feedback

    Trauma and Injury

    There is a need to represent both traumatic and non-traumatic injuries as well as those in which it is undetermined whether the cause of the injury was due to trauma or not. There are forms of trauma that do not result in structural damage, such as emotional trauma , which are defined as traumatic injuries.

    Concepts that do not specify trauma are now modeled with the appropriate morphology concept or <<Damage (morphologic abnormality) but are not necessarily assigned a Due to (attribute) of Traumatic event (event), unless the form of injury can only occur with morphologic trauma. In other words, if a concept refers to an injury, and that injury may occur either through trauma or non-traumatic means (e.g. tumor, ischemia, etc.), then it should be modeled without a Due to (attribute) of |Traumatic event|. If, however, the term does not specify trauma, but the type of injury can only occur as a result of trauma (e.g. open wounds), then these concepts would have the DUE TO attribute added.

    Historically, injury concepts have been modeled in SNOMED CT as damage to a body structure, unless specifically stated as non-traumatic. 19130008 |Traumatic abnormality (morphologic abnormality)| has been inactivated effective January 2021 in order to separate mechanism of injury (i.e. trauma) from structure (i.e. damage).

    Clinical finding and Disorder Modeling

    A disorder is always and necessarily an abnormal clinical state.

    Disorder modeling information is as follows:

    Causative agent (attribute): Substance (substance) or one of its descendants, if known

    Pathological process (qualifier value) hierarchy

    In order to fully describe the full range of hypersensitivity responses, there are qualifier values in the Pathological process (qualifier value) hierarchy. (See also Qualifier Value page).

    Allergic reaction

    Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) disease

    Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) disposition

    Nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reaction

    Intolerance to substance

    Provide Feedback
    Figure: Stated view of 15920201000119103 |Allergic reaction caused by fish (disorder)|
    Figure: Stated view of 838367000 |Allergic rhinosinusitis caused by Aspergillus (disorder)|
    Figure: Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) disposition example, stated view of Allergy to nut (finding)
    Figure: Allergic disposition (finding) model in stated view
    Figure: Nonallergic hypersensitivity (pseudoallergic) reaction model in stated view
    Figure: Stated view of Intolerance to substance (finding) model
    Figure: Stated view of Intolerance to drug (finding)
    Traumatic injuries are now being modeled as morphologic changes to a body structure due to traumatic event.
  • Non-traumatic injuries are being remodeled as morphologic changes to a body structure but without a |Due to (attribute)| relationship to |Traumatic event (event)|. Nontraumatic injuries should be modeled as a subtype of 1119219007 |Nontraumatic injury (disorder)|.

  • 417163006 |Traumatic or non-traumatic injury (disorder)| is currently modeled with GCIs to reflect the two notions of damage without trauma (non-traumatic injury) and trauma with or without damage (traumatic injury).

    Where a request for a specific traumatic or non-traumatic disorder is made and there is support in literature for both, then concepts representing both the traumatic and non traumatic forms together with a generic form should be added.

    An injury due to friction can be represented using 400152004 |Friction injury (morphologic abnormality)|, in which case it will not classify as a kind of wound.

    For example,

    • 47222000 |Friction injury of tooth (disorder)|

      • 400068007 |Mechanical irritation (morphologic abnormality)|

    However, most disorders that are named abrasion imply that skin or other tissue has been abraded (scraped or worn away). Thus, they are also considered wounds and will correctly classify as wounds after assigning the correct morphology, 400061001 |Abrasion (morphologic abnormality)|.

    For example,

    • 211039006 |Abrasion of skin of chest (disorder)|

    While many medical definitions refer to abrasions as superficial injuries of the skin and subcutaneous structures, the term is also used for areas such as dentistry to define superficial excoriations of teeth, ophthalmology, and also can be used for other integumentary structures such as nails. The FSN should clearly identify which structure the concept refers to and where this structure is skin, this must be specified.

    Ruptures are modeled with an |Associated morphology (attribute)| of 125671007 |Rupture (morphologic abnormality)|. A disorder concept modeled with a Rupture (morphologic abnormality) classifies as a subtype of 417163006 |Traumatic or non-traumatic injury (disorder)|.

    • Traumatic rupture concepts are modeled with a |Due to (attribute)| of << |Traumatic event (event)|

    • Nontraumatic rupture concepts are modeled as a subtype of 1119219007 |Nontraumatic injury (disorder)|

    Trauma, injury

    Provide Feedback
    Specific Clinical finding and Disorder Modeling
    Disorder Combination Modeling
    Complication and Sequela Modeling
    Provide Feedback

    The use of |Spontaneous event (event)| is in development, as many of the concepts that related to non-traumatic are not in fact spontaneous.

    • In those cases where it is clinically apparent that the cause is spontaneous, the concept is modeled with a |Due to (attribute)| of |Spontaneous event (event)|.

    • In those cases where it cannot be determined that the clinical condition is actually spontaneous (i.e., no known underlying mechanism), a |Due to (attribute)| relationship to |Spontaneous event (event)| would be omitted.

    Friction injury, abrasion

    Rupture

    Provide Feedback

    Traumatic injury (disorder)

    Clinical Finding and Disorder

    Hierarchy
    Definition
    Example

    Clinical finding

    Normal/abnormal observations, judgments, or assessments of patients

    167222005 | Abnormal urinalysis (finding) |

    Disorder

    Clinical findings or observations are the active acquisition of subjective or objective information from a primary source. This includes information acquired from human observers, through recording of data via the use of scientific instruments, or indirectly from samples taken from the source, and evaluated separately.

    The default context for a Clinical finding concept is:

    • Present (vs. being absent)

    • Subject of the record (the patient)

    • Current, if not specifically stated or specified to a time in the past by an entity linked to the concept

    The term observations should not be confused with Observable entity. Observable entity is the name of something that can be observed and represents a question or assessment (e.g. |systolic blood pressure|, |color of iris|, |gender|) which can produce an answer or result.

    Given differences in information models, a finding about the subject of the record may be captured in different ways. For example, the information may be captured using either an Observable entity concept together with a value, or a Clinical finding concept which represents what is being observed together with the result of the observation. To assist the transformation between these concepts, if when adding a requested Clinical finding concept, the modeling requires an Interprets relationship, and the Observable entity concept does not exist, then a new Observable entity concept should be created.

    The Clinical finding hierarchy contains the subhierarchy of Disorder. Concepts that are descendants of Disease (disorder) are always and necessarily abnormal clinical states. The Disease subtype allows diseases to be subtypes of other disorders, as well as subtypes of findings.

    Concepts with a semantic tag of disorder , must have a parent of Disease (disorder) or subtype of Disease (disorder).

    • For example,

      • 95617006 | Neonatal cyanosis (disorder)| has the parent, Disease (disorder). Neonatal cyanosis is also a subtype of 3415004 | Cyanosis (finding)|

    The distinction between a disorder and a finding may be difficult to define. There are, however, distinct characteristics of each.

    Hierarchy
    Characteristics

    In some cases the disease process is irrefutable, e.g., meningococcal meningitis. In others an underlying disease process is assumed based on the temporal and causal association of the disorder and its manifestation, e.g., nystagmus (disorder) is different from nystagmus present (finding). Nystagmus present (finding) may be a normal physiological response to head rotation. A person who spins around and has nystagmus present (finding), does not have nystagmus (disorder). Alternatively, a person may have nystagmus (disorder), but not nystagmus present (finding), i.e., they do not currently manifest nystagmus. Similarly, hearing loss (disorder) is different from perception of hearing loss (finding), which can be due to a number of temporary causes, such as excessive ear wax.

    Always and necessarily an abnormal clinical state

    39579001 | Anaphylaxis (disorder) |

    Disorder

    -Always and necessarily abnormal

    -Necessarily have an underlying pathological process

    -Have temporal persistence (may be under treatment, in remission, or inactive, even though they are still present)

    -May be present as a propensity for certain abnormal states to occur, even when treatment mitigates or resolves those abnormal states

    Finding

    -May be normal (but not necessarily)

    -May exist only at a single point in time (e.g. a serum sodium level)

    -Cannot be temporally separate from the observation (one cannot observe them and say they are absent, nor can they be present when they cannot be observed)

    -Cannot be defined only in terms of an underlying pathological process that is present, when the observation itself is not present

    Context

    Findings and Observables

    Findings and Disorders

    Topics in this section

    Clinical Finding and Disorder Attributes Summary
    Clinical Finding Defining Attributes
    Clinical Finding and Disorder Naming Conventions
    Clinical finding and Disorder Modeling
    Provide Feedback

    Complication and Sequela Modeling

    Combined disorders can occur, for example:

    • One disorder causes the other (causal relationship)

    • One disorder is temporally related to another

    • Two disorders have both a causal and temporal relationship to each other

    Attributes that can be used to define such causal and temporal relationships are:

    • Associated with (attribute)

      • Causative agent (attribute)

      • Due to (attribute)

      • Temporally related to (attribute)

    A complication is an unexpected condition, outcome, or adverse event due to another condition, procedure, or treatment.

    Concepts representing a disorder caused by another disorder, or disorders following either medical or surgical procedures should be modeled using a parent of 64572001 |Disease (disorder)| or the appropriate intermediate primitive. The word complication in an FSN should only be used when it can be verified that the caused disorder is an unintended or unexpected event.

    Conditions that are caused by another condition, but are not unexpected, should be modeled with a DUE TO relationship, but should not be named as complications.

    For example, 10629511000119102 |Rhinitis of pregnancy (disorder)|

    Conditions co-occurrent with another disorder but are not caused by the underlying disorder are co-morbidities and should not be modeled using the DUE TO relationship.

    For example, 31563000 |Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy (finding)|

    Perioperative complications refer to complications temporally related to a surgical procedure. They include pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative complications and are modeled with a parent of Disease (disorder) and a relationship consisting of Temporally related to (attribute) or an appropriate subtype with a value of <<387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)|. A temporal complication does not necessarily imply a causal (Due to) relationship to the surgery itself, as the complication may be related to any disorder, event, or procedure occurring either prior, during, and/or after surgery. For this reason, perioperative complications do not have a stated Due to relationship unless an underlying cause is clearly stated in the FSN.

    The following naming convention applies to those conditions that occur temporally, i.e. either before, during, or after the operative episode but do not have a causal relationship.

    • FSN: Postoperative X (disorder)

    • PT: Postoperative X

    For example,

    • Perioperative hematoma (disorder)

    • Postoperative hypothyroidism (disorder)

    This attribute is used to model concepts in which a clinical finding occurs after another clinical finding, procedure, or event. Neither asserting nor excluding a causal relationship, it instead emphasizes a sequence of events. Naming pattern is ‘x following y’.

    For example,

    123948009 |Disorder following viral disease (disorder)| occurs After (attribute) 34014006 |Viral disease (disorder)|

    The Due to and After attributes are used to model a disorder that occurs after a disorder or procedure with a causal relationship. Both the cause and the After relationship must be specified. The naming pattern is due to and following.

    This attribute is used to model a preoperative complication. Strictly, a preoperative complication is a disorder that complicates the procedure, rather than being a complication of that procedure. A preoperative complication might be considered to be a disorder that exists prior to surgery that adversely affects the surgery or that results in an intraoperative or postoperative complication.

    This attribute is used to model a disorder that occurs during a procedure.

    For example,

    Due to and During attributes can be used to model a disorder that occurs during a procedure (e.g., intraoperative complication) with a causal relationship. Both a cause and a temporal relationship to the cause must be specified.

    A sequela is a disorder that is a consequence, but not an unexpected outcome, that follows after another disorder, procedure, or event. These conditions are often described with the words following, after, post, sequela(e), or late effects.

    Sequelae can be in the following forms:

    • Following

    • Due to and following/after

    • During and following/after

    These conditions should be modeled with After (and also Due to if there is a causal relationship).

    For example,

    • Disorder due to and following another disorder = 698737005 |Obstructive hydrocephalus due to and following meningitis (disorder)|

    • FSN: Disorder X [due to and] following <<disorder /<<procedure /<event

    • PT: Disorder X [due to and] following <<disorder /<<procedure /<event

    • SYN: [Disorder X as a] Sequela of <<disorder /<<procedure /<event

    • SYN: [Disorder X as a] Late effect of <<disorder /<<procedure /<event

    For example,

    • Disorder due to and following another disorder (disorder)

    • Disorder due to and following meningitis (disorder)

    • Disorder due to and following procedure (disorder)

    Not all surgical sequelae are complications of surgery but rather expected late effects. Conditions that occur following surgery, but not necessarily Due to the surgery, are modeled only with an After relationship.

    • FSN: Disorder X following << 387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)

    • PT: Disorder X following << 387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)

    For example,

    • Contraction of eye socket following enucleation (disorder)

    • Scar following surgery (disorder)

    Conditions that occur following surgery and are explicitly stated as causal/due to are modeled with a Due to (attribute) of << 387713003 Surgical procedure, and an After (attribute) of << 387713003 Surgical procedure.

    • FSN: Disorder X due to and following <<387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)

    • PT: Disorder X due to and following <<387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)|

    For example,

    • Encephalopathy due to and following cardiopulmonary bypass (disorder)

    • Cataract lens fragments in vitreous of eye due to and following cataract surgery (disorder)

    • Disorder due to and following breast reduction (disorder)

    Maternal, fetal, neonatal

    Pregnancy Periods

    The life phase of pregnancy is unique in that two actors are participants in the scenario, and modeling must distinguish between the two.

    • For example,

      • Fetal tachycardia in antepartum versus Maternal tachycardia in antepartum

    Mother and fetus share many time periods, such as antenatal. However, some periods are not shared, as in the case of intrapartum. The mother’s intrapartum period includes stages one, two, and three; the fetus’ intrapartum period includes only stages one and two.

    A diagram of the relationships between these periods is shown below:

    The life phase of pregnancy-related findings and disorders is applied using the Occurrence (attribute). A concept must identify:

    1. Which actor (mother or the fetus/neonate) does the circumstance relate

    2. In which life phase of the actor does the condition necessarily relate

    In the majority of circumstances, the actor to which the condition relates is straight forward: mother or fetus or neonate.

    For example,

    • Antenatal care relates to both the mother and fetus/neonate

    • Antenatal depression clearly relates to the mother

    • Short cord with antenatal problem directly relates to the fetus

    Other instances such as Intrapartum hemorrhage due to marginal placenta previa may not be so clear without explicit modeling, as hemorrhage with placenta previa can relate to the fetus or mother.

    The word perinatal within finding terms is problematic, because it almost always relates to the fetus/neonate. Due vigilance is required to exclude the rare possibility that the condition could relate to the mother. Perinatal can refer to the mother alone (perinatal depression) or to a time period relating to the fetus until the neonate is seven days old.

    This situation creates two problems:

    #1

    The term perinatal is a term with widely varying definitions across countries due in part to legal variations in the time period that defines stillbirth.

    The term neonatal generally describes an infant within the first 28 days. Where the condition relates to an infant within the first seven days, the term early neonatal is allocated. The term late neonatal is used from day eight to 28 (WHO, 1992). Although these descriptions are used widely, they are not universally accepted worldwide. These time periods are useful, however, in modeling existing content which was derived from WHO sources.

    Future content should use the term neonatal unless a valid use case can be supported in the content request to distinguish between the early and late neonatal period.

    #2

    The terming of the perinatal period for the fetus and neonate is problematic as there is not a clinically useful name for the actor that covers this entire temporal period. It is possible that baby might be applicable, i.e., Perinatal disorder of baby , but this is not used clinically. To create an explicit FSN, the rather ungainly term |[Clinical finding] of fetus and/or early neonate| has been used. This problem is anticipated to be temporary, as new content will be steered to explicitly state whether the condition relates to the fetus or to the neonate.

    In relation to the neonate, there is a clinical and epidemiological distinction between the early neonatal period and the late neonatal period. Conditions in the immediate (early) neonatal period are largely influenced by intrauterine conditions; those in the late neonatal period are more influenced by early extrauterine life. This distinction is important as perinatal disorders historically were often considered a concatenation of disorders occurring in the fetal phase and the early neonatal phase. However, one unresolvable difficulty with this definition is that there is no international agreement in the definition of perinatal phase , which has variable definitions:

    • WHO = 22 completed weeks of gestation and ends seven completed days after birth

    • UK = the time from fetal viability from about 24 weeks of pregnancy up to seven days of life

    • USA = 28 weeks of gestation to the end of the seventh day of life

    • Australia = 20 completed weeks of gestation and ends 28 completed days after birth

    Maternal time period values can be found in the subhierarchies below:

    Generally, it is clear what the appropriate value is, but some knowledge is required to distinguish the correct choice in some circumstances. Definitions have been added to aid in correct selection.

    For example,

    In relation to postpartum uterine hemorrhage , this would be modeled using an Occurrence (attribute) of Postpartum period. The puerperium is generally defined as the period within 42 days after birth, and thus, the postpartum period relates to this six-week timeframe. Some conditions can occur more than 6 weeks post-delivery, e.g., postpartum thyroiditis , postnatal depression (onset can range from a few days to a few weeks following delivery, generally in the first 2–3 months following childbirth). In this situation, the choice of the more general Maternal postnatal period should be made.

    Similar to the Maternal time periods above, the fetal period is the superordinate as illustrated below. There is no label for the concatenated time of the actor during the fetal and neonatal period within medicine (though colloquially called baby), and so the superordinate is named fetal and/or neonate. Similarly, to find concepts which describe conditions of this global phase requires a preferred term expressing this, but in the case of perinatal conditions relating to the fetus and/or early neonate, the word perinatal is commonly used as a substitute.

    Review is ongoing of all disorder concepts containing the phrase fetal or neonatal. The concept 450426006 |Fetal or neonatal period (qualifier value)| will be inactivated, leaving only 1156676003 |Fetal and/or neonatal period (qualifier value)|.

    • The fetal or neonatal value is historically derived from ICD and may contain legacy context causing ambiguity.

    • The fetal and/or neonatal period is explicitly designed to subsume the fetal period, the neonatal period , and in rare cases where these two may overlap, as in 1193538001 |Fetal intrapartum second stage and/or early neonatal period (qualifier value).

    Model as IS A 362972006 | Disorder of labor / delivery (disorder)| due to X (disorder).

    The definition status of the concept 87476004 |Neonatal seizure (finding)| is to remain primitive for two reasons:

    • The time period where a neonatal seizure may occur (from birth to 44 weeks postmenstrual age) differs from the period usually representing the neonatal phase of life (the first 28 days following birth).

    • Defining this concept results in incorrect subsumption with types of epilepsy being classified as subtypes. Epilepsy is not a type of seizure, rather an epileptic seizure is a manifestation of epilepsy.

    Allergy to X vaccine

    Overview

    The following modeling and terming guidelines apply to concepts in the International Release.

    Modeling

    "Allergy to X vaccine" concepts shall be modeled using the proximal primitive modeling pattern. Due to the small number of concepts (n<25), no template will be created. The "Allergy to substance" template can be consulted for generalized modeling guidance.

    Single or multiple ingredient vaccine

    Stated parent concept

    420134006 |Propensity to adverse reaction (finding)|

    Semantic tag

    The following illustrates the stated view for top level grouper 863903001 |Allergy to component of vaccine product (finding)|:

    The following illustrates the inferred view for top level grouper 863903001 |Allergy to component of vaccine product (finding)|:

    The following illustrates the stated view for 294663006 |Allergy to component of vaccine product containing Hepatitis A virus antigen (finding)|:

    The following illustrates the inferred view for 294663006 |Allergy to component of of vaccine product containing Hepatitis A virus antigen (finding)|:

    The following illustrates the stated view for 294662001 |Allergy to component of vaccine product containing Measles morbillivirus and Mumps orthorubulavirus and Rubella virus antigens (finding)|:

    The following illustrates the inferred view for 294662001 |Allergy to component of vaccine product containing Measles morbillivirus and Mumps orthorubulavirus and Rubella virus antigens (finding)|:

    Before (attribute)
  • During (attribute)

  • After (attribute)

  • Complication

    Perioperative complications

    88797001 |Complication of surgical procedure (disorder)| is not a subtype of perioperative complication, as it does not include a temporal relationship. Similarly, 738668004 |Perioperative complication (disorder)| is not a subtype of 88797001 |Complication of surgical procedure (disorder)|, as there is no causal relationship. Some disorders may specify both a causal and temporarily relationship and would be modeled such that they would classify under both 738668004 |Perioperative complication (disorder)| and 88797001 |Complication of surgical procedure (disorder)|.

    The following attributes are used in the modeling of various combinations:

    After

    After without causal relationship

    Post-infectious disorders are not subtypes of infectious disorders (unless the disorder is itself an infectious disease). The |After (attribute)| is used for linking post-infectious disorders with their associated infections.

    After with causal relationship

    Before

    During

    During without causal relationship

    During with causal relationship

    Sequelae

    Naming conventions for sequelae

    Naming conventions for surgical sequelae (temporal relationship but no causal relationship)

    Naming conventions for surgical sequelae complications (temporal relationship and causal relationship)

    Provide Feedback
    Stated view of 123948009 |Disorder following viral disease (disorder)
    Stated view of 713890008 |Hypoxemia during surgery (disorder)
    Stated view of 698737005 |Obstructive hydrocephalus due to and following meningitis (disorder)|

    (finding)

    Definition status

    Primitive

    • Because 'Allergy to X vaccine' represents the propensity to an allergic reaction to any component (including excipients) of a vaccine rather than the modeled active ingredient(s), these concepts cannot be sufficiently defined. As a result, there will not be subsumption between "Allergy to X vaccine" concepts.

    • Exceptions: Grouper concept 863903001 |Allergy to component of vaccine product (finding)| is modeled as sufficiently defined and subsumes the remaining concepts.

    Attribute: Has realization

    Attribute value = 472964009 |Allergic process (qualifier value)|

    Attribute: Causative agent

    Range: 787859002 |Vaccine product (medicinal product)|

    Cardinality: 1..1

    • Allergy to X vaccine concepts should have one and only one |Causative agent| attribute.

    • Concepts representing "vaccine product containing only" should not be used in modeling Allergy to X vaccine concepts.

    FSN

    Use the following pattern for the FSN; align terming and case sensitivity with the FSN for the concept that represents the vaccine product that is the cause of the allergy.

    • Allergy to component of <Causative agent FSN> (finding)

    For example,

    • Allergy to component of vaccine product containing Hepatitis A virus antigen (finding)

    • Allergy to component of vaccine product containing Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen (finding)

    • Allergy to component of vaccine product containing Clostridium tetani and Corynebacterium diphtheriae antigens (finding)

    • Allergy to component of vaccine product containing Measles morbillivirus and Mumps orthorubulavirus and Rubella virus antigens (finding)

    Preferred Term

    Use the following pattern for the PT; align terming and case significance with the PT for the disorder that is the target of the vaccine. For multiple ingredient vaccine products, the disorders must be listed in alphabetical order and separated by the word "and".

    • Allergy to <disorder> vaccine

    • Allergy to <disorder> and <disorder> vaccine

    • Allergy to <disorder> and <disorder> and <disorder> vaccine

    For example,

    • Allergy to Hepatitis A vaccine

    • Allergy to pneumococcal vaccine

    • Allergy to diphtheria and tetanus vaccine

    • Allergy to measles and mumps and rubella vaccine

    For national extensions modeling using "vaccine containing only" product concepts, these disorder-based descriptions will need to reflect "only" to eliminate duplicate descriptions.

    Synonyms

    A synonym corresponding to the FSN is required.

    Synonyms beginning with the disorder that is the target of the vaccine are allowed. For multiple ingredient vaccine products, the disorders must be listed in alphabetical order and separated by the word "and". Note that these are not true synonyms; they may be updated and identified as "near-synonym" descriptions when that functionality becomes available although that would also potentially require updating the PT.

    For example,

    • Hepatitis A vaccine allergy

    • Pneumococcal vaccine allergy

    • Diphtheria and tetanus vaccine allergy

    • Measles and mumps and rubella vaccine allergy

    For national extensions modeling using "vaccine containing only" product concepts, these disorder-based descriptions will need to reflect "only" to eliminate duplicate descriptions.

    Terming

    Exemplars

    Exemplars

    Provide Feedback

    Null values

    Representing null values

    The addition of new precoordinated content in the Clinical finding (finding) hierarchy that specifies null values, such as 'not recorded', is unacceptable. There is a use case for recording the reason that data are missing; however, this information should be recorded using a concept from the Qualifier value (qualifier value) subhierarchy rather than a Clinical finding (finding) concept.

    New qualifier values of this type should be agnostic as to what data are missing but support the reason why the data are missing.

    Provide Feedback

    PERINATAL & NEONATAL

    Pregnancy Period Values

    Obstetric conditions

    Use of the term obstetric is confusing in regards to both timing and determination of the intended person. Concepts should rather explicitly identify these elements.

    Fetal Neonatal Period Values

    When modeling a fetal finding or fetal disorder, the |Finding site (attribute)| should not be a fetal body structure unless the structure is unique to the fetal period, such as |Umbilical cord structure (body structure)|.

    Note: This is guideline has not been applied to fetal procedures at this point in time.

    Fetal and/or neonatal period versus Fetal or neonatal period

    Umbilical cord complication

    Neonatal seizure (finding)

    Provide Feedback

    Congenital

    The concept 66091009 |Congenital disease (disorder)|, means present at birth. Though the word congenital may be applied to genetic disorders, the term genetic is preferred for those disorders.

    The logical definition of a congenital disorder must include:

    • Occurrence = Congenital (qualifier value).

    It may also include:

    • Finding site = X (body structure)

    • Associated morphology = X (morphologic abnormality)

    • Pathological process = Pathological development process (qualifier value)

    All of these defining relationships should be grouped to indicate that the abnormal morphology occurs at the finding site, results from a pathological development process, and is present at birth. Where a morphologic abnormality occurs at more than one finding site, or one body structure has multiple morphologic abnormalities, multiple relationship groups should be created and the pathological process and occurrence relationships included in each relationship group.

    The following guidelines apply:

    A disorder with the word congenital in the FSN should classify under 66091009 |Congenital disease (disorder)|.

    Congenital X (morphologic abnormality) concepts are being inactivated hence Congenital anomaly disorder grouper concepts, such as 9904008 |Congenital anomaly of cardiovascular system (disorder)|, should be modeled with an Associated morphology (attribute) of 49755003 |Morphologically abnormal structure (morphologic abnormality)I and a Pathological process relationship.

    Whether creating new or revising existing concepts, only use Congenital X (morphologic abnormality) concepts if no non-congenital supertype of that morphologic abnormality is active.

    • For example, use 399898009 |Misalignment (morphologic abnormality)| not 102283003 |Congenital misalignment (morphologic abnormality)|

    When modeling a congenital neoplasm disorder, the attribute-value relationship of Pathological process (attribute) = Pathological development process (qualifier value) is not used.

    While some disorders are only congenital or only acquired, some disorders may be either congenital or acquired. The _ acquired_ form should only exist when there is a need to differentiate from the congenital form. Do not model a disorder as acquired if a congenital variant does not exist.

    Congenital disorders are modeled using 246454002 |Occurrence (attribute)| of 255399007 |Congenital (qualifier value)|. If the FSN does not include congenital , it should not be modeled as congenital. The precise meaning of the FSN should be followed (e.g. many hereditary disorders have congenital appearances).

    For example,

    33534005 |Congenital bowing of femur (disorder)| is modeled with 246454002 |Occurrence (attribute)| of 255399007 |Congenital (qualifier value)|

    Acquired disorders are those that originate and manifest after birth. The disorders are associated with a period of life, as opposed to a specific process or structure. All diseases (disorders) that occur after birth are considered acquired.

    Generally, concepts that explicitly state acquired in the FSN or in a synonym should be modeled with Occurrence = 767023003 |Period of life beginning after birth and ending before death (qualifier value)|.

    For example,

    240253004 |Acquired abduction deformity of foot (disorder)| has acquired in the FSN and is modeled with Occurrence = 767023003 |Period of life beginning after birth and ending before death (qualifier value)|.

    Congenital absence can represent at least three different classes of absence:

    1. Total developmental absence of the affected organ/structure

    2. Partial absence of the affected organ/structure

    3. In utero amputation of all or part of the affected organ/structure

    Conventional use of the terms aplasia and agenesis often regard these as synonymous. However, proper definitions of these terms suggests a distinction that should be made in the terminology when included in the FSN.

    • Aplasia - defective development resulting in the absence of all or part of an organ or tissue.

    • Agenesis - absence of an organ due to nonappearance of its primordium in the embryo. (implies complete absence)

    In order to conform to the intended meaning of the FSNs as described by the original source, the following modeling patterns are proposed for congenital absence terms:

    Congenital absence of X

    • Associated morphology = Absence (morphologic abnormality)

    • Occurrence = Congenital (qualifier value)

    • Finding site = Structure of X (body structure)

    • Pathological process = Pathological developmental process (qualifier value)

    Aplasia

    • Associated morphology = Aplasia (morphologic abnormality)

    • Occurrence = Congenital (qualifier value)

    • Finding site = Structure of X (body structure)

    • Pathological process = Pathological developmental process (qualifier value)

    Partial absence of X

    • Associated morphology = Aplasia (morphologic abnormality) or Transverse deficiency (morphologic abnormality)

    • Occurrence = Congenital (qualifier value)

    • Finding site = Part of X (body structure)

    • Pathological process = Pathological developmental process (qualifier value)

    Agenesis of X or Complete absence of X

    • Associated morphology = Agenesis (morphologic abnormality)

    • Occurrence = Congenital (qualifier value)

    • Finding site = Entire X (body structure)

    • Pathological process = Pathological developmental process (qualifier value)

    • Acquired abnormality of congenital anomaly

    • Malformation, deformation, anomaly

    Enteritis

    The term enteritis is broad and commonly refers to inflammation of the intestine, especially the small intestine. However, in some conditions, e.g. phlegmonous enteritis and regional enteritis, the term enteritis refers to any part of the digestive tract.

    Thus, all descriptions of enteritis must stipulate the specific body structure that is affected to avoid potential misinterpretations and incorrect modeling.

    For example,

    • Enteritis of intestine

    • Enteritis of small intestine

    Provide Feedback

    Neonatal period

    According to the American Medical Association, the periods of life in the postnatal period include all periods after birth including the neonatal or immediate postpartum period. It may be challenging to differentiate a congenital disorder from a neonatal disorder. A condition may be present at birth, i.e. congenital; however, clinical manifestations may take longer to appear, i.e. during the neonatal period (e.g. 14333004 |Alloimmune neonatal neutropenia (disorder)|).

    Congenital versus acquired

    Remodeling Acquired Disorders

    When revising acquired disorders, remove any acquired morphologies and replace with general parent morphologies, e.g. replace 127560004 |Acquired deformity (morphologic abnormality)| with 6081001 |Deformity (morphologic abnormality)|. Then add Occurrence attribute with a value of 767023003 | Period of life beginning after birth and ending before death (qualifier value)|. One of its children may also be used if the FSN states the period of life, such as Childhood or Adulthood.

    Congenital absence

    See also relative sections:

    Provide Feedback
    Stated view of 33534005 |Congenital bowing of femur (disorder)|
    Stated view of 240253004 |Acquired abduction deformity of foot (disorder)|

    Disorder Combination Modeling

    Many disorders can occur in combination within the same patient. Guidance on the modeling and terming of FSNs for disorder combinations aims to achieve consistency. Clinically significant disorder combinations are represented in SNOMED CT by a single concept so that users can document temporal (timing) and causal (cause/effect) relationships between the conditions.

    Expressing Associations

    To express an association between conditions, one of the following associations is used:

    • Simple co-occurrence: two or more conditions have no direct causal or temporal relationship but are found together more often than by random chance

    • Causation 1: the cause is another finding or disorder, an event, or procedure

    • Causation 2: the cause is a physical force, physical object, organism, or substance

    • Temporal association: the timing of the two conditions occur before, during, or after each other

    When considering disorder combinations two questions can be asked:

    1. Is there a causal relationship?

    2. What is the temporal relationship?

    The following table provides the possible combinations of answers. It allows authors to assign combination disorders to a corresponding category below, to which the appropriate modeling and FSN construction is applied.

    Is there a stated causal relationship?
    Temporal relationship
    Resulting FSN pattern

    *Note: |Temporally related to (attribute)| and its subtypes Before and During are only approved to model perioperative complications and a limited number of other clinical findings.


    FSN: X with Y

    Assign each condition as a supertype (or ensure that each participating disorder is present in the ancestor tree following classification).

    Use simple co-occurrence for two or more conditions that are strongly associated by means other than causality or a temporal relationship (e.g. a common predisposition) where representing such conditions as separate statements would result in a loss of the associated between the conditions.

    For example,

    • Named syndromes, such as 398114001 | Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (disorder)|

    • Manifestations of systemic disorders, such as 83901003 |Sjögren's syndrome (disorder)|

    Do not use simple co-occurrence for those disorders with more than one anatomical site or more than one associated morphology. Those disorders should rather be represented as individual concepts in a medical record.

    Correct examples:

    · Sinusitis with nasal polyps (disorder)

    · Acute bronchitis with bronchiectasis (disorder)

    Incorrect examples not to be repeated:

    · Psoriasis-eczema overlap condition (disorder)

    · Hay fever with asthma (disorder)


    Causation 1 applies when the cause is another finding, disorder, event, or procedure

    For conditions that are causal, or causal and co-occurring, construct the FSN with due to

    • X due to Y

    For conditions specified as causal and temporal, construct the FSN with due to and the temporal relationship

    • X due to and following Y

    • Assign the causal disorder as the target of a Due to relationship

    • When modeling only causation, ensure the caused condition is represented in the supertypes and/or axioms

    • Ensure the caused condition is represented as a supertype and/or axiom

    • Ensure Disease (disorder) or the appropriate intermediate primitive is a supertype

    • Assign the procedure as the target of a Due to relationship

    • Ensure the caused condition is represented as a supertype and/or axiom

    • Assign the event as the target of a Due to relationship

    • 735173007 | Shock due to anaphylaxis (disorder)| is an example of a condition caused by a clinical finding/disorder. Because the shock and the anaphylaxis are co-occurring, both conditions are represented in the supertypes and axioms, in addition to the Due to relationship.

    • 413532003 | Anemia due to blood loss (disorder)| is an example of a condition caused by a clinical finding/disorder. Because the bleeding could have been controlled and thus not necessarily present, only causation is modeled in this concept. The blood loss/bleeding is not represented as a supertype.

    • Neutropenia associated with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (disorder) - Do not use associated; use only with instead. So, |Neutropenia with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (disorder)|.

    • Dilated cardiomyopathy secondary to granuloma (disorder) - Do not use secondary to; use due to instead. So, |Dilated cardiomyopathy due to granuloma (disorder)|.

    Causation 2 applies when 1the cause is a material entity, and 2the means of exposure/introduction are not significant.

    1. A material entity refers to a concept within the Substance, Physical object, Pharmaceutical/biologic product, Physical force, and Organism hierarchies.

    2. If the means of exposure/introduction are significant, then the causal factor is represented by a concept from the Event hierarchy, and the concept is modeled as Causation 1.

    FSN: X caused by Y

    Assign the caused disorder (X) as a supertype, or ensure that the caused disorder is a supertype following classification.

    Assign the causal factor (Y) as the value of a Causative agent (attribute).

    • Contact dermatitis caused by chemical (disorder)

    • Choking due to airway obstruction (finding)

    • Coma associated with diabetes mellitus (disorder)

    • Laser-induced burn (disorder)

    Where X occurs after Y:

    • if it is not specified that X is due to Y (although causality is frequently implied), construct the FSN as X following Y

    Assign the condition or procedure that occurred first in the patient as the target of an After (attribute) relationship. Assign the condition that occurred second as a supertype (or ensure its presence in the ancestor tree).

    Examples:

    • 402490007 |Calcinosis following localized fat necrosis (disorder)|

      • The fat necrosis occurred first in the patient, so this concept will have an After (attribute) with a value of Fat necrosis (disorder). The calcinosis occurred secondarily, and thus Calcinosis (disorder) is a supertype of this concept.

    • 16055031000119100 |Astigmatism of right eye following operative procedure (disorder)|

    Not all disorders occurring in combination should be precoordinated into a single concept. Multiple clinical conditions should not be precoordinated in order to facilitate convenient recording in the medical record, even if the two conditions are often reported together.

    • For example,

      • The clinical conditions gastroenteritis and dehydration often occur in combination but require separate resolution, and therefore, are best recorded separately in the medical record as 25374005 |Gastroenteritis (disorder)| and 34095006 |Dehydration (disorder)|.

    In general, 47429007 |Associated with (attribute)| should be avoided due to the ambiguity which it conveys and the difficulty in applying this role consistently. Instead, Due to is used when there is a direct causal relationship between the conditions; otherwise, the clinical conditions should be recorded as separate concepts in the medical record.

    There are a couple of exceptions when the use of 47429007 |Associated with (attribute)| is appropriate:

    • Associated with is used to associate the device with a complication where the device may not be a direct cause.

      • For example, an infection of the tissue surrounding an implanted or inserted device is associated with the device but may not be due to the device itself.

    • Involves the propensity of an adverse reaction to a substance to occur (other than hypersensitivity or allergic or non-allergic hypersensitivity).

    • Associated with is used to associate the intolerance to the substance.

    It must be determined if a disorder is caused either by another disorder or by a material entity. A material entity is a concept found in Substance, Physical object, Pharmaceutical/biologic product, Physical force, or Organism subhierarchies. These subhierarchies are the current range constraints for the Causative agent (attribute) in the Clinical finding domain. For combined disorders where a cause can be either a disorder (eg, alcoholism) or a material entity (eg, alcohol):

    Model as due to disorder if it is the indirect cause.

    • For example,

      • Megaloblastic anemia due to alcoholism (disorder)

    Model as caused by material entity if it is the direct cause.

    • For example,

      • Inflammation of pancreas caused by alcohol (disorder)

    In modeling concepts related to infectious diseases, a number of considerations need to be taken into account.

    1. When the disorder is an infectious disease itself, and the organism is specified, then the concept will be modeled with

      1. |Causative agent (attribute)| with the specified organism

      2. |Pathological process (attribute)| with the type of infectious process

    2. Disorders can be modeled with |Due to|, with |After|, or with both |Due to| and |After| relationships to infectious diseases.

    • If the focus disorder is itself an infectious disorder, it will also have a |Causative agent| relationship when the organism is specified.

      • For example,

        • |Causative agent| relationship: 721742004 |Otitis media caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (disorder)|

    Generally, when |Causative agent| is used in the concept's modeling, the terming 'caused by' is used in the FSN. Similarly, when |Due to| is used in the concept's modeling, the terming 'due to' is used in the FSN. In some situations, both the |Causative agent| and |Due to| are used in a concept's model, and so the naming may vary based on the situation.

    In some cases, the DUE TO takes precedence because of a relationship between the causative agent and the DUE TO disorder.

    For example,

    |Disorder due to alcohol abuse (disorder)|

    In other cases, the DUE TO relationship is used as a means to classify the concept appropriately while the CAUSATIVE AGENT takes precedence.

    For example,

    1251395000 |Injury of skin caused by class Anthozoa (disorder)|

    In this case, the DUE TO represents the "injury" part of the concept and allows classification as a traumatic injury. An alternative, but less appealing FSN would have been |Disorder of skin due to traumatic injury caused by class Anthoza|. So, if the concept FSN specifies a disorder causally associated with another disorder, then use due to in the FSN; if the FSN specifies a disorder causally associated with an agent (organism, physical object, substance, etc.), then use caused by in the FSN.

    Exceptions may exist to the above guidance which requires review on a case-by-case basis.

    The FSN submitted by a requestor may be used as preferred term even if it does not comply with the above recommended pattern. However, do not use phrases such as secondary to, as a result of, etc., in lieu of due to.

    Rather than the naming conventions described above, use the names that are accepted clinical parlance and that represent specific pathophysiologic entities for some combined disorders, as the preferred term.

    The stricter rules for FSN construction do not prevent the addition of more familiar connectives in other descriptions, for example with, or associated with.

    X due to and following Y

    Before

    X before Y

    During

    X due to and during Y

    Before, During, and/or After

    X due to and temporally related to Y

    Yes – cause is a physical object/force, organism, or substance (Causation 2)

    Not stated

    X caused by Y

    After

    N/A

    Before

    N/A

    During

    N/A

    Before, During, and/or After

    N/A

    No stated causal relationship

    Not stated

    Document separately

    After

    X after Y

    Before

    X before Y

    During

    X during Y

    Before / During / After

    X temporally related to Y*

    The operative procedure occurred first in the patient, so this concept will have an After (attribute) with a value of Surgical procedure (procedure). The astigmatism occurred secondarily, so Astigmatism (disorder) is a supertype of this concept.
    |Due to| relationship: 698733009 |Intestinal obstruction due to tuberculosis (disorder)|
  • |Due to| and |Causative agent| relationship: 866044006 |Mycosis due to human immunodeficiency virus infection (disorder)|

  • |After| relationship: 182961000119101 |Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis following infectious disease (disorder)|

  • |After| and |Causative agent| relationship: 4740000 |Herpes zoster (disorder)|

  • |Due to| and |After| relationship: 1148594002 |Chronic arthritis due to and following rheumatic fever (disorder)|

  • Yes – cause is another finding, disorder, event, or procedure (Causation 1)

    Not stated

    X due to Y

    Causal & Temporal Combinations

    Simple Co-occurrence

    Naming pattern:

    Modeling pattern:

    Be aware of conditions which likely exist prior to a disorder or procedure.

    For example,

    Legacy term 609454008 | Induced termination of pregnancy complicated by acute necrosis of liver (disorder)|

    • Acute necrosis of liver was likely present prior to the procedure; there is no explicit causation. The concept will be inactivated. Instead, separate concepts 714812005 | Induced termination of pregnancy (procedure)| and 197269008 | Acute necrosis of liver (disorder)| should be documented in the medical record.

    Causation 1

    Naming pattern

    Modeling pattern

    For a condition caused by a clinical finding/disorder

    For a condition caused by a procedure

    For a condition caused by an event

    Correct examples:

    Incorrect examples not to be repeated:

    Determining causation only versus causation and co-occurrence

    There are no heuristics to standardize the determination of a precoordinated combination modeled using only the Due to relationship versus modeling the Due to relationship in addition to representing the causative condition in the supertypes. If both conditions must be present for the other to occur, both should be represented in the supertypes. Whether both conditions must be present concurrently is determined by an understanding of the disease process. Considerations include whether the conditions are chronic diseases, as these types of conditions will be ever present and thus require representation in the supertypes. If the causing condition resolves but the resultant condition can remain, then representation of both conditions in the supertypes is unwarranted.

    There are approximately 300 legacy concepts with co-occurrent and due to in the description. Do not add new concepts with the terming co-occurrent and due to; instead use co-occurrence modeling (both conditions are represented in a supertype) in addition to the Due to (attribute) if warranted by the clinical condition.

    Causation 2

    Naming pattern

    Modeling pattern

    Correct example:

    Incorrect examples not to be repeated:

    Temporal Sequencing (No Causation)

    Naming pattern

    Modeling pattern

    Caution against combination

    Associated with (attribute)

    Device complications

    Intolerance to substances

    There is no intolerance process that serves as the value for Has realization.

    When to use "caused by" and when to use "due to"

    Is cause a disorder or material entity?

    Is cause a disorder or infectious organism?

    Applying the |Due to|, |After|, or both |Due to| and |After| relationships to a concept will not lead to it being a subtype of |Infectious disease (disorder)| unless it is itself an infectious disease.

    Exception to naming convention for combined disorders

    Disorder combination modeling

    • Covers combinations of only two disorders. However, combinations often include more than two disorders (for example, syndromes). Document multiple conditions in a single statement only for syndromes or strong associations based on a common predisposing factor.

    • Does not cover absent components or negation

    • Does not cover cases where combination concepts are demonstrably classification-derived. (This limitation accepts that some content may be so obviously based on a class or category in a classification that it would be undesirable to reinterpret its semantics.)

    • The modeling approach may be difficult to apply in all cases of combined disorders; domain-specific templates should be developed to ensure modeling consistency and accuracy.

    Provide Feedback
    Stated form of |Disorder due to alcohol abuse (disorder)|
    Inferred form of |Injury of skin caused by class Anthozoa (disorder)|

    After

    Multisystem disorders

    Multisystem disorders are often rare conditions. There may be limited information about such disorders, so they should be carefully modeled.

    When determining parent concepts:

    • A multisystem parent concept should be included.

    • Genetic or inherited disorders should be modeled in the same way as other genetic and inherited disorders.

    • The manifestations of the disorder must always necessarily be true before assigning the relevant parents.

    • Attributes must also always necessarily be true.

      • For example,

        • 702410002 |Iris coloboma with ptosis, hypertelorism, and mental retardation (disorder)| Since the coloboma of the iris is not always present, coloboma would not be explicitly modeled in the relationships.

    Some multisystem disorders can be named by their manifestations. The FSN should be descriptive rather than just a list of names.

    For example,

    • 717909004 |Bilateral microtia with deafness and cleft palate syndrome (disorder)|

    A multisystem disorder with an eponymous syndrome name should be included as a synonym only.

    Provide Feedback

    Measurement findings

    The following applies to the subcategory of 118245000 |Measurement finding (finding)|:

    • Detected and Not detected are used in the FSN, PT, and modeling of measurement findings instead of Present , Positive , Absent, and Negative.

      • Existing acceptable descriptions with Present , Positive , Absent, and Negative can remain.

    • Above reference range , Below reference range , Within reference range , and Outside reference range should be used in the FSN, PT, and modeling of measurement findings instead of High , Raised , Elevated , Increased , Low , Decreased , Normal , and Abnormal.

      • Existing acceptable descriptions with High , Raised , Elevated , Increased , Low , Decreased , Normal , and Abnormal can remain.

    • Borderline measurement findings are ambiguous and should not be added.

    • False positive and false negative measurement findings should not be included.

    • Clinical measurements concerning specific parts of the body should be modeled with a Finding site relationship if an appropriate body structure is available in addition to the role group with Interprets (attribute) and Has interpretation (attribute).

    See

    template
    Provide Feedback

    Iatrogenic

    Adding further concepts to the iatrogenic disorder hierarchy is discouraged. Concepts must have iatrogenic in the FSN to be modeled with an IS_A relationship to 12456005 |Iatrogenic disorder (disorder)|. An iatrogenic disorder should remain as a primitive concept if dependent only upon parent relationships to describe the disorder. In cases where the modeling is explicit, e.g. 202762009 |Iatrogenic cervical spinal stenosis (disorder)|, the concept can be defined.

    For example,

    Provide Feedback
    Figure: Stated view of |Iatrogenic cervical spinal stenosis (disorder)| using IS_A 12456005 |Iatrogenic disorder (disorder)|

    Lesion

    The word lesion can be used to refer to both structural and functional abnormalities. This makes a subtle distinction between the clinical finding and disorder semantic tags. The majority of lesions in SNOMED CT are in the disorder subhierarchy.

    If a concept refers to a lesion that is a structural abnormality, then apply the (disorder) semantic tag, and model with an 116676008 |Associated morphology (attribute)| of << 52988006 | Lesion (morphologic abnormality)| .

    If a procedure refers to a lesion that is a structural abnormality, then model with a 405816004 |Procedure morphology (attribute)| of << 52988006 | Lesion (morphologic abnormality)|.

    Lesion concepts referencing characteristics of a lesion are subtypes of 300577008 |Finding of lesion (finding)|.

    Imaging-related lesion findings remain as finding concepts.

    Functional lesions should not be modeled using values from the 52988006 |Lesion (morphologic abnormality)| subhierarchy.

    Lesion as a disorder

    Lesion as a finding

    Provide Feedback

    Adverse reaction to X vaccine

    Overview

    The following modeling and terming guidelines apply to concepts in the International Release.

    Modeling

    "Adverse reaction to X vaccine" concepts shall be modeled using the proximal primitive modeling pattern. Due to the small number of concepts (n<50), no template will be created. The "Adverse reaction to substance" template can be consulted for generalized modeling guidance.

    Single or multiple ingredient vaccine

    Stated parent concept

    281647001 |Adverse reaction (disorder)|

    Semantic tag

    The following illustrates the stated and inferred view for top level grouper 293104008 |Adverse reaction to vaccine product (disorder)|:

    The following illustrates the stated view for top level grouper 219075006 |Adverse reaction to vaccine product containing bacteria antigen (disorder)|:

    The following illustrates the inferred view for top level grouper 219075006 |Adverse reaction to vaccine product containing bacteria antigen (disorder)|:

    The following illustrates the stated view for single ingredient vaccine 293126009 |Adverse reaction to vaccine product containing Hepatitis A virus antigen (disorder)|:

    The following illustrates the inferred view for single ingredient vaccine 293126009 |Adverse reaction to vaccine product containing Hepatitis A virus antigen (disorder)|:

    The following illustrates the stated view for multiple ingredient vaccine 293125008 |Adverse reaction to vaccine product containing Measles morbillivirus and Mumps orthorubulavirus and Rubella virus antigens (disorder)|:

    The following illustrates the inferred view for multiple ingredient vaccine 293125008 |Adverse reaction to vaccine product containing Measles morbillivirus and Mumps orthorubulavirus and Rubella virus antigens (disorder)|:

    (disorder)

    Definition status

    Primitive

    • Note: Because 'Adverse reaction to X vaccine' represents the propensity to an adverse reaction to any component (including excipients) of a vaccine rather than the modeled active ingredient(s), these concepts cannot be sufficiently defined. As a result, there will not be subsumption between "Adverse reaction to X vaccine" concepts.

    • Exceptions: Grouper concepts 293104008 |Adverse reaction to component of vaccine product (disorder)|, 219075006 |Adverse reaction to component of vaccine product containing bacteria antigen (disorder)|, and 408672009 |Adverse reaction to component of vaccine product containing virus antigen (disorder)| are modeled as sufficiently defined and subsume the remaining concepts.

    Attribute:

    Causative agent

    • Range: <<787859002 |Vaccine product (medicinal product)|

    • Cardinality: 1..1

      • Adverse reaction to X vaccine concepts should have one and only one |Causative agent| attribute.

      • Concepts representing "vaccine product containing only" should not be used in modeling Adverse reaction to X vaccine concepts.

    FSN

    Use the following pattern for the FSN; align terming and case sensitivity with the FSN for the concept that represents the vaccine product that is the cause of the adverse reaction.

    • Adverse reaction to component of <Causative agent FSN> (disorder)

    For example,

    • Adverse reaction to component of vaccine product containing Hepatitis A virus antigen (disorder)

    • Adverse reaction to component of vaccine product containing Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen (disorder)

    • Adverse reaction to component of vaccine product containing only Clostridium tetani and Corynebacterium diphtheriae antigens (disorder)

    • Adverse reaction to component of vaccine product containing Measles morbillivirus and Mumps orthorubulavirus and Rubella virus antigens (disorder)

    Preferred Term

    Use the following pattern for the PT; align terming and case significance with the PT for the disorder that is the target of the vaccine. For multiple ingredient vaccine products, the disorders must be listed in alphabetical order and separated by the word "and".

    • Adverse reaction to <disorder> vaccine

    • Adverse reaction to <disorder> and <disorder> vaccine

    • Adverse reaction to <disorder> and <disorder> and <disorder> vaccine

    For example,

    • Adverse reaction to hepatitis A vaccine

    • Adverse reaction to pneumococcal vaccine

    • Adverse reaction to diphtheria and tetanus vaccine

    • Adverse reaction to measles and mumps and rubella vaccine

    For national extensions modeling using "vaccine containing only" product concepts, these disorder-based descriptions will need to reflect "only" to eliminate duplicate descriptions.

    Synonyms

    A synonym corresponding to the FSN is required.

    Synonyms beginning with the disorder that is the target of the vaccine are allowed. For multiple ingredient vaccine products, the disorders must be listed in alphabetical order and separated by the word "and". Note that these are not true synonyms; they may be updated and identified as "near-synonym" descriptions when that functionality becomes available although that would also potentially require updating the PT.

    For example,

    • Hepatitis A vaccine adverse reaction

    • Pneumococcal vaccine adverse reaction

    • Diphtheria and tetanus vaccine adverse reaction

    • Measles and mumps and rubella vaccine adverse reaction

    For national extensions modeling using "vaccine containing only" product concepts, these disorder-based descriptions will need to reflect "only" to eliminate duplicate descriptions.

    Terming

    Exemplars

    Provide Feedback